Page 107 - Open-Hole Log Analysis and Formation Evaluation

-

For
The
‘
The
LOG
GR
study
ISF
IES
DIT
Log
FIGURE
MLL.
LDT
DLL
FDC
SNP
CNL
Dual
NGS
studies,
(1973).
MSFL
-
need
Neutron
Porosity
Proximity
further
5.19
.
results
such
Schlumberger
_
for
Table
QUALITY
as
4
LL
LU
GR
ILD
ILD
5.2
ILD
log
ILM
16”
.
Control (Bateman
SS1
SFL
MLL
LLS
SS2
LLD
SNP
LITH
details
show,
Curve
FFDC
Need for Log
NFDC
the
PROX
N
NRAT
NRAT
FECN
NECN
W2NG
CMSF
W5NG
W4NG
W3NG
WING
:
on
|.
Calibration
—
_.
poor
one
1985).
quality
Well Services.
log
CONTROL
by
AFTER
log
+1
+2
#2
+2
+2
+2
Quality
+4
+2
summarizes
‘
Zero
#20
+0.08
Tolerance
control
the
.Tolerances
Neinast
quality
has
TOLERANCES
Control
calibrations
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
and
+ 6
4
+4
+20
+20
#15
+15
results
+22
+20
#13
+20
+14
+20
+6
6
20
#15-
been
20
+20
0.7
07
20°
control
0.5
«+03
SUMMARIES
0.5.
Plus
me
0.04
of
1.05
0.04
°°.
Knox
please
can
Tolerance’.
of

their
(Schlumberger
BETWEEN
%
°.°.%
%
%
%
refer
QM
QM
2M
CPS
CPS
CPS
CPS
result
CPS
CPS
CPS
CPS
Sun
CPS
CPS
CPS
Units
to
RATIO
RATIO .
in
MHO/M
MHO/M
MHO/M
MHO/M
documented
Oil
MHO/M-
a
Logs).
MMHO/M
studies.
MMHO/M
MMHO/M
—
MMHOIM
-
Log
in

As

large
per-
Courtesy
Company
these
various
Quality

If
to
of
be
the
the
the
time.
go
there
No
the
Verden
before
Source:
quality
during
quality
After
Sonic
tracted.
bottom
smooth
there
centage
logs
a
Density
objective
Density
Density
company
Neutron
It is the
recording
minimum
is
formation
back
responses,
Even
the
Induction
this degree
logging
is
logging
of
Upper Valley
Field,
}
Calibrations
matter
in
in
Give
each
the
depth-related
done after the
to
are ways
impossible
errors
control
errors
any
logging
Practical Log
are
Reprinted
the
the
logs
crew
to
logs
available.
the
errors
logging
Field,
obtained
log
logs
in
.
the best
0.01
0.01
personnel
the
0.02
get
log.is
rigs
-10
are
engineer
hole
Utah
Oklahoma
operation.
develop
equipment
of the well. Do
hole should be
Learn
interruption.
expect a representative
being
error
question
Quality
g/cc
g/cc
g/cc
first print is
only
with
not
procedures
in
engineer
after
company’s
mmho
of the
“remarks”
operation
down.
before
a
how competent
what
another
function of the well
engineers
by permission
is
are
failure,
about
Logging
best
complete,
and
and
whom
thoroughly as possible. Ask for an
Checks
or
error.
measurements
they
36%
46%
may
23%
rigging
33%
25%
15%
46%
distract
of the
log quality also depends
in which bad logs can
column
when
relationships
chance
engineer.
after
will
completely
you
the
Generally
on
hole
resistivity
to
the
available
quality.
validity,
make
mean
discuss
down,
the
operations
to be available-and
the
of the
in
200
enough to verify the
it
tool
work.
and
but
ft
explanation
job.
SPWLA from
log
survey
of mutual
Frequently,
include
Perhaps
is
logging
log.
conscientious
objective
in the
perform
of
request
with
problems,
should
how
The
a
an
once
56%
the
100%
the
26%
render them useless as formation
43%
61%
81%
one
78%
Bateman
the
to
be
of any
Further
Neinast
within
the
and
or
repeat
heading.
mistakes when
pipe
most
trust with
logging
engineer
rerun
most
use
and
operator’s representative to
is
made but before any more prints
in
errors
: AND BEFORE Texas . Big Wells Field, OF ‘SUMMARY Schlumberger Dresser Atlas Welex of Log Quality Study by Sun Oil TABLE 5.2 Results I. METHODS OF GATHERING FORMATION EVALUATION DATA 5. WIRELINE LOGGING OPERATIONS 93
type.
competence and
1000
observer
(1985).
of
the
This
enter
details
more
verifications
are
ft
set,
of any abnormal
Knox
they are
operation
critical
them.
during
ensure
the
of
of
the
engineer
_
made.
_—
—
33%
58%
T'
70%
67%
1973.
he
log
repeat
may be,
made.
curve
in-
evaluation tools.
it wil!
dis-
in
of the
this
time
that

Service-company personnel
discussed with
unit during
important
relatively
Everyone is reluctant
defy detection at the wellsite. To
integrity
logging
as
with
may be
log
log