Page 96 - Optofluidics Fundamentals, Devices, and Applications
P. 96

Optofluidic Trapping and Transport Using Planar Photonic Devices   77


                  3.  Insensitivity to surface/solution conditions: Unlike electroos-
                      mosis, for example, this technique is largely independent
                      of surface/solution conditions and can be used for a much
                      broader class of bioanalytical operations.
                  In this chapter we begin by reviewing existing micro- and
               nanoscale transport mechanisms and discuss the advantages of
               optofluidic transport in the context of this state of the art. Following
               this we present a review of a number of recently published optoflu-
               idic transport architectures and introduce our own technique using
               SU-8 waveguides and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidics.
               A theoretical description of the transport is then provided and used
               to back up the advantages purported above. The final section dis-
               cusses the application of this technique to a specific application
               area, namely, optofluidic chromatography.




          5-1 Optically Driven Microfluidics


               5-1-1  A Brief Review of Traditional Transport Mechanisms
                      in Microfluidic Devices
               On length scales relevant to transport in micro- and nanofluidic
               devices, fluid flow and species transport can be accomplished by a
               number of elegant techniques, a few of which include pressure-driven
               flow [1], electrokinetics [2–5], buoyancy [6], magnetohydrodynamics
               [7], capillarity, electrowetting [8],and thermocapillarity [9] (see Stone
               et al. [10] or textbooks by Nguyen and Wereley [11] or Li [5] for more
               details). Of these techniques the former two are the most commonly
               exploited, largely because of the relative ease with which they can be
               implemented. Pressure-driven flow is likely the simplest to imple-
               ment, requiring only a pressure or vacuum source to generate flow,
               and is compatible with a broad range of fluid and surface conditions.
               On-chip valving techniques such as those used in multilayer soft
               lithography [1] enable precise and highly parallel flow control and
               sample routing down to the scale of approximaely 1 μm. Since the
               average velocity of a pressure-driven flow scales with the square of
               the critical channel dimension, controlled manipulation of length
               scales much smaller than this is exceptionally difficult. Another limi-
               tation of pressure-driven transport is that it exhibits a parabolic veloc-
               ity profile meaning that the flow is faster in the center of the channel
               than at the edges near the walls. This causes an effect known as dis-
               persion [12] (essentially the spreading out of a transported sample
               because parts of it are moving faster than others), which is undesir-
               able in many separation and some transport applications. Electroki-
               netic transport, where flow is induced through the interaction of an
               applied electric field and the charge in the electrical double layer near
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101