Page 110 - Origin and Prediction of Abnormal Formation Pressures
P. 110

90                         A. GUREVICH, G.V. CHILINGAR, J.O. ROBERTSON AND E AMINZADEH


                             0.020
                        ~..'-  (0.087)
                                    6

                                     5
                        2           4


                        .~7
                         r
                        "0

                        t9

                         o~

                        IX.
                              0.010                I   ,
                            (0.043)                4  (13)         8  (26)
                                       Thickness  of  Shales,  m  (ft)

            Fig.  3-7.  Pore  pressure  gradients  in  shales  vs.  thickness  of shale beds:  1 --  Zhiloy Island;  2  --  Oil Stones;  3  =
            Bakhar;  4  =  Sangachaly-Sea-Duvannyy-Sea-Bulla  Island;  5  =  Bulla-Sea;  6  =  Khamamdag-Sea-Karasu-
            Sangi-Mugan-Persiyanin-Bank.  (Modified  after  Buryakovsky  et  al.,  1986.  In  Gurevich  and  Chilingar,  1995,
            fig.  5,  p.  133.)


               The  writers  analyzed  the  reviewed data  on pressure  distribution  in Azerbaijan.  They
            tried  to  determine  (1)  whether  or  not  current  theories  of  the  pressure  abnormality
            distribution  in  Azerbaijan  are  complete  enough,  and  (2)  whether  or  not  the  pressure
            measurement  methods  are  fully  reliable.  Although  up  to  now  a  considerable  amount
            of research  work  has  been  done  on  abnormal  pressures  in  Azerbaijan,  not  all  aspects
            were  exhaustively  studied.  The  analysis  conducted  by  the  writers  suggested  some  new
            areas  and directions  of possible research  work that can be done  by the oil companies to
            increase drilling and production efficiency in Azerbaijan.
               (1)  Most  authors  who  studied  the  Azerbaijan  overpressures  believe  that  compaction
            of sediments  is the totally dominant cause  of pressure  abnormality and,  therefore,  there
            should be  a close  relation  between  pressure  and porosity abnormalities.  This concept is
            not convincing from the viewpoint of an analysis of the nature of geological processes. It
            also contradicts  the  well-known  fact that many very shallow  fields  had initial pressures
            higher  than  the  overburden  pressure  (Anikiev,  1964).  This  cannot  be  explained  by
            compaction only and recognition of a contribution of vertical migration of hydrocarbons
            to pressure abnormality in these fields is unavoidable.
               (2)  Deformation  of  wellbore  walls  is  considered  to  be  mostly  the  result  of  shale
            plasticity combined with the impact of pressure abnormality. This may not be completely
            true.
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115