Page 261 - Origin and Prediction of Abnormal Formation Pressures
P. 261

PORE WATER COMPACTION CHEMISTRY AS RELATED TO OVERPRESSURES          233

            TABLE  10-2
            An  overview  of proposed  mechanisms  to  account  for  the  origin  of chemical  differences  in  subsurface  pore
            waters  (after Chilingarian et al.,  1994,  table 5-2, p.  111)

            Reference                  Mechanism(s)
            Washburne  (1914)          Subsurface evaporation and juvenile water additions.
            Richardson  (1917)         Leaching of disseminated salt and salt diffusion from salt bed.
            White  (1957)              Burial diagenesis  of seawater.
            Berry (1959)               Chemical osmosis.
            Chave (1960)               Trapped remnants  of seawater moved by sediment compaction.
            Von Engelhardt and Gaida (1963)   Ion exchange  capacity of clays under compaction.
            Bredehoeft et al.  (1963)   Membrane filtration by clays.
            Powers  (1967)             Alteration of smectite to illite during deep burial.
            Serruya et al. (1967)      Electrical potentials (electrodiagenesis).
            Mangelsdorf et al.  (1969)   Molecular settling.
            Hitchon et al.  (1971)     Trapped pore water diluted by fresh water recharge  and
                                       concentration by clay membrane filtration.
            Sayles and Manheim  (1975)   Interaction between  sediments  and water contained in their pore
                                       spaces.
            Carpenter (1978)           Infiltration of subaerial brine.
            Stoessell and Moore  (1983)   Salt related brines diluted by mixing with seawater.
            Hanor (1987b)              Thermohaline overturn of pore water.



            (1970)  confirmed  these  effects.  Sayles  and  Manheim  (1975)  stated that  temperature  is
            the most single significant factor affecting the composition of pore waters.
               With respect to laboratory-simulated compaction studies, problems arise from (1) the
            magnitude of pressure used to  squeeze  out the pore  water (chemistry of water changes
            with pressure),  (2) analytical techniques involving minute amounts of squeezed-out pore
            waters,  (3)  specimen preparation,  and (4) contamination involved in collecting the pore
            water.

            Palmer and Sulin water classifications
               A  concise discussion  of Palmer and  Sulin's  water classification methodologies is  in
            order  so the reader  can quickly comprehend  the  meaning,  formulate relationships,  and
            categorize  subsurface  water  chemistry  results  based  on  these  classification  schemes.
            Both  schemes could be useful in making comparisons with published subsurface  water
            analysis  data.  The  foundation  for  such  analytical  schemes  is  the  composition  of  the
            seawater  system,  i.e.,  contents  of  (Na +,  K +,  Ca 2+,  Mg 2+,  CI-,  SO 2-,  and  CO 2-)  in
            H20.  Schoeller's  system for the most part addresses petroleum-reservoir waters and the
            reader is referred to Schoeller (1955) and Collins (1975) for details.

            Palmer's classification
               Palmer (1911)  devised his water classification system based on the chemical  salinity
            (salts  of  strong  acids)  and  alkalinity  (salts  of weak  acids).  Briefly,  the  concept  of the
            chemical  salinity  is  that  all  cations  (positive  ions)  and  certain  anions  (negative  ions),
            such  as  chloride,  sulfate,  and  nitrate,  can  cause  salinity.  Alkalinity  depends  on  the
   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266