Page 137 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 137

116                                                                 PART 2   Concepts


             The most primitive expression of inventory status is limited to data on quantities on
        hand and on order. Action then is determined by comparing need (demand) with that
        availability status or on depletion of inventory with some predetermined minimum, in
        which case the action taken reflects antici pated future need. A more elaborate expression
        of inventory status is provided by the classic “perpetual inventory control” equation
        introduced in Chapter 6 and repeated below, which states the elements of expanded
        inventory status and their relationship. This equation, while valid, is still somewhat
        primitive:
                                           A   B – C   X

        where A is the quantity on hand, B is the quantity on order, C is the quantity required,
        and X is the quantity available.
             If X has a positive value, it indicates the quantity available for future requirements.
        If it is negative, it is an indication of an impending shortage, that is, inadequate coverage.
        The idea behind this venerable approach to in ventory control is for the value of X to
        equal or exceed zero at all times. This is accomplished by increasing the value of B by
        placing a new order whenever X approaches zero or turns negative. This policy would
        appear to preclude shortages, but it does not because the expression of inventory status
        is too crude on three counts:

             1. Information on timing of the demand and supply is lacking.
             2. The data on B and C represent summaries.
             3. The status formula does not provide for planned (future) coverage.
             For example, status might be indicated as follows:

             On hand:       100
             On order:      120      100   120 – 200   20
             Required:      200

             The technique signals that all is well and that no action is called for, but in fact, there
        will be a shortage, as becomes evident when information on timing is associated with the
        status data:
             On hand:       100
             On order:      120, due June 1
             Required:      200, May 15

             Coverage is adequate in terms of quantity but not in terms of timing. To illustrate
        the opposite case, let the status be as follows:

             On hand:        20
             On order:      100      20   100 – 200   –80
             Required:      200
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142