Page 218 - Packed bed columns for absorption, desorption, rectification and direct heat transfer
P. 218

208


                                                                                             2
                                                                                          3
                           ensuring liquid superficial velocity in the packing from 5 to 200 m /(m h),
                                                            2
                           distributed in 923 drip points per m . The concentration of the NaOH in the
                           liquid phase was kept constant by feeding concentrated NaOH from a Mariott
                           vessel. The data for the effective surface area a e for all investigated packings
                           (Table 2) versus liquid superficial velocity L are represented in Figs. 18-21. The
                           comparison of the data for a e with the specific surface area a of the
                           corresponding packings shows that at the maximal investigated liquid
                           superficial velocity used for each of them a e is greater. Le. the ratio a/a at
                           sufficiently high liquid superficial velocity reaches values greater than 1. It
                           means that the effective surface of the drops and jets trickling in the free volume
                           of the packing is significant.


                               300


                               200
                            1

                                             —
                                              —
                                        _~ •—— " -—1                         -  -  —
                                            *
                                         —  —  —
                                     •—• ,     1                                      •  RSR0.S
                                                                                       •  RSR 0.7
                               100
                                               1  I—-—""""                             •  RSR1
                                                                                       •  RSR 1,5
                                80              ,  —  —  •  —  '
                                                                                       A  RSR 2
                                                                                       *  RSR 3
                                60
                                        6   8  10       20        40    60  80 100      200   300
                                                             L k,nfl/(nfh)
                           Fig. 18. Effective surface area of the investigated metal RSR versus the liquid superficial velocity.
                                                                                           3
                                                                                              2
                                  The data for metal RSR No 3, Fig. 18, show that even at 1=10 m /(m h)
                           the effective surface of this packing is some higher than its specific surface area.
                                      3   2
                           At Z=200 m /(m h) its effective surface is more than two times higher than its
                           specific one. It must be mentioned that for the most of the packing types, Figs.
                           19, 20 and 22 for the smallest packing elements, the line in coordinates a e-f(L)
                           has greater angle of inclination. Probably it is connected with different
                           increasing of the area of jets and drops trickling in the packing void fraction s as
                           well as of the wetted surface area, with increasing of the liquid superficial
                           velocity. For the Ralu-Flow packing such a difference in the angle of inclination
                           is not observed.
                                  The influence of the packing material on the effective surface area can
                           be seen in Figs. 23-25, where a comparison between the effective surface of
                           metal and plastic RSR with one and the same dimensions for each of the
                           materials is presented.
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223