Page 216 - Packed bed columns for absorption, desorption, rectification and direct heat transfer
P. 216

206


                           Without this limitation the same authors presented also the following equation:




                                                                                             (90)



                           Here the index "w" denotes water.
                                  For calculation of the liquid holdup H tip between the loading and the
                           flooding points the following equation is presented in [316,322]:




                                                                                             (91)




                                  The comparison of the experimental data with all equations by Billet
                           and Schultes [316, 322] using the constants presented in Table 6 shows the
                           following average relative deviations:
                           for loading and flooding point - 5%;
                           for liquid holdup- 6.7%;
                           for pressure drop- 9.1%;
                           for absorption and desorption mass transfer coefficients controlled by the gas
                           and the liquid phase -12.4%;
                           for rectification efficiency - 14.1%.
                                  Because the static holdup of an industrial packing is very low in
                           comparison to the dynamic one, usually in their calculation the dynamic holdup
                           is used instead of the total liquid holdup.
                                  For determination of the liquid holdup over the loading point, the
                           following equation is presented [326]:


                                           (-T
                                      1 + 36                                                 (92)




                                  The comparison of Eq. (92), published in 2001 (after transformation)
                           and Eq. (88) from 1965 shows that the only difference between them is the
                           value of the experimental constant, 36, respectively 17. Probably, this is
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221