Page 57 - Performance Leadership
P. 57

46 • Part I A Review of Performance Management

            action. Secondly, risk management challenges the intuitive belief of per-
            formance measurement that everything will proceed as planned. When
            there are discontinuities that threaten corporate objectives, having gone
            through a risk management exercise prepares the organization better for
            dealing with them. Last, if identifying business risks leads to mitigating
            them already, why wait until performance indicators light up in red?



            Dare to Break the Rules

            Performance indicators should not be used just to judge performance
            but also to spark discussion. Current processes aimed at evaluating per-
            formance are very aimed at control and are restricted to evaluating the
            metrics themselves. The numbers come into the management infor-
            mation system, are compared against target, and are color-coded. Supe-
            rior performance leads to green numbers, performance on target is
            shown by black numbers, and underperformance is shown by red num-
            bers. The management information systems apply a filter to manage
            by exception and produce a list of indicators where people have under-
            performed. They are then warned and, at year’s end, are evaluated to
            decide if they get a bonus or not. The results are predictable: people
            try to “game” the numbers, coming up with better scores that look good
            on paper, but actually damage the business. A more communicative
            process is needed. Color coding should not be automatically added the
            moment the new data comes into the management information sys-
            tem. By comparing results with the target, the responsible manager
            assigns the color coding. Perhaps a target is met, but the manager still
            assigns the color red to the metric as it could have been done even bet-
            ter. Or a target has not been met, but is assigned a green color, because
            external circumstances significantly changed. With the analysis at
            hand, the managers go into the management meeting where each
            manager explains the color coding. The manager then is queried about
            choices made and in the end receives a sign-off (or not) by senior man-
            agement.
              This process may come across as peculiar. “Writing your own report
            card” is something we instinctively reject. All managers would imme-
            diately score themselves a “green” on all metrics. But in the new process
            there is still a sign-off. Senior management approves or modifies the end
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62