Page 240 - Petroleum Geology
P. 240

area because the vitrinite reflectance is 0.9%”, and such statements may be
            very misleading. The data can be acquired from a single well, so they must be
            used  positively to indicate areas of  interest, not negatively to discard areas.
            Very  large volumes of  oil, including some of  the giant oil fields, are in sedi-
            mentary rocks that are regarded as immature by vitrinite reflectance standards.
              Palynologists had also noted that the colour of  spores and pollen became
            darker with increasing depth, and interpreted these changes as due to thermal
            influences (Gutjahr,  1966).  The  same reservations  apply  to  this  index  of
            maturity as for vitrinite reflectance.


            PRIMARY MIGRATION

              We  infer that petroleum source material is disseminated through the source
            rock sensu strict0 and therefore petroleum generated from it is also dissemi-
            nated. The question then arises: how does this move out of the source rock?
              There  are three  possible  processes that each have their adherents:  mole-
            cular solution, colloidal solution, and as a separate, immiscible phase, in the
            pore water.
              Solution  in pore  water is attractive because the initial dissemination is no
            obstacle, and it is the process that requires least work. The difficulties with
            this hypothesis  are twofold.  Some process must exist for the exsolution of
            the petroleum; and the laboratory-measured solubilities appear to be too low
            by at least an order of magnitude. We will take the latter point first.
              Even allowing for some doubt about the actual solubilities of the various
            hydrocarbons, we  can  reach  an estimate of  the solubility required in some
            areas. Jones (1981, p.  105) took DOW’S (1974) data for the Bakken Shale in
            the Williston basin, Wyoming, U.S.A., and showed that a solubility of at least
            15,000 ppm  was  required  to account  for  the known oil in place assuming
            that the Bakken Shale compacted from 10 to 5% porosity during generation.
            (There is no point  in making the distinction between weight/weight and vol-
            ume/volume in such estimates of  solubility.)  The maximum solubility of oil
            was taken as 200 ppm  (see Price,  1976, p. 220, fig. 7). Even if  the compac-
            tion range is extended to 25-575  during generation, the solubility required is
            only reduced to 3000 ppm.  No manipulation  of  these figures seems capable
            of  reducing the requirement to the observed order of magnitude of oil solu-
            bility in water.
              This argument, it will be noted, does not eliminate solution as a process -
            even  as an  important  process  - but it does suggest that if  the source rock
            generates liquid  petroleum, solution is unlikely to be the main, general process
            of  primary migration to commercial oil fields.
              Bonham (1980), on the other hand, modelled fluid migration in a compact-
            ing sedimentary basin and, applying it to a “representative” area of the US.
            Gulf  Coast,  came  to the conclusion  that  a  solution process could account
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245