Page 270 - Petroleum Geology
P. 270

used  to assess areas of petroleum potential, so we may be discarding areas on
             account of a false impression of immaturity.
               Meanwhile,  it is  essential  to  understand  clearly  that  petroleum  can and
             does occur in sedimentary sequences that have chemical indications of imma-
             turity. As Hunt (1979, p.  528) wrote, “Considerable  research still needs to
             be  done  to define  the immature-mature  boundary with  different types of
             both marine- and land-derived organic matter”.


             PETROLEUM MIGRATION AND FAULTS

              Geochemical  evidence  for  deep  source  rocks,  stratigraphically  removed
             from the accumulations, required an explanation of  the migration  from the
             one  to  the  other.  During  the last decade, it has become almost universally
            accepted that faults are the conduit for this migration.  This hypothesis is a
             consequence of  the geochemical, to a great extent, because the consensus of
            opinion up  to the  mid-1960s  was  that  faults generally acted as barriers to
             petroleum migration. In the mid-l970s, great interest was shown in the hypo-
            thesis  proposed by  Price (1976; and in verbal presentations before that) that
            petroleum was generated at depths of  10 km  or more, and migrated in solu-
            tion in water up faults. Such ideas are stimulating in themselves, and stimulate
            further research  into the possible processes. But the physical difficulties of
            fluid migration in fault planes has received little attention.
              We  must be careful to distinguish between lateral migration through faults,
            from one  block  to the other, and in faults, up and down fault planes (Fig.
            11-7). As regards lateral migration through faults, there is good field evidence
            that many faults do not permit this migration, and that some do. As regards
            migration in faults, up or down  (but mostly up), there is also good field evi-
            dence that many do not permit this migration, and that some do. To simplify
            the discussion, we  shall take these two dichotomies separately, starting with
            lateral migration through a fault.
              Any  fault  trap  is  evidence that  lateral  migration  is  prevented  (note the
            tense) by the fault, but we must distinguish between fault traps that are con-
            tained by juxtaposed porous and permeable rock units that could have been
            carrier beds, from those that are contained by fine-grained, relatively imperme-
            able juxtaposed rock units that could not be carrier beds. We are not concerned
            for the moment with  the latter, but with a fault plane that is itself a barrier
            to migration due to the fine-grained material or gouge in it.
              In general, movement on such faults must have caused a reduction in mean
            pore  size  so  that  the capillary  displacement  pressure  required  for  further
            migration exceeds that available in the migrating oil. We can therefore visualize
            a range  of  fault-plane  textures  varying from a clayey fault gouge or smear
            with  very  high  capillary  displacement  pressures  to one  with no significant
            change of texture from one side to the other. We  infer that the trapping capa-
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275