Page 36 - Petroleum Geology
P. 36

15

            North  America  (see Matsumoto,  1980). These  events were of  great signifi-
            cance  for  the  accumulation  of  petroleum,  and  we  shall examine  them  in
            more detail in a later chapter. We  shall see that these transgressions were but
            an  episode  in  a world-wide Mesozoic tectonic event that may well have in-
            volved all four causes listed above.
              The  fact  that  transgressions seem  to have  a  world-wide  tendency  more
            commonly  than  regressions is  probably  due  to the  amplifying  effect  of  a
            rising sea level on subsidence of  a sedimentary basin compared with falling
            sealevel on subsidence.  Regional variations in subsidence rates may account
            for the lack of  strict contemporaneity because we observe only the net effect
            of  subsidence  and  sediment  accumulation.  It  is  clear  that  orogeny  may
            generate enough sediment to lead to a regressive sequence in spite of a con-
            temporary rise of  sealevel, and so mask it; but it is unlikely that subsidence
            will  so  exceed the rate of  sea-level fall that a transgressive sequence of  any
            magnitude  will  accumulate during a period of  eustatic fall of  sea level. For
            example, the  Catskill  delta  of  the northern  Appalachians developed during
            the  middle  and  late  Devonian,  as  a  result  of  the  Acadian  orogeny,  while
            transgression  was  taking  place  in  western  Canada,  western  Australia  and
            north-west Europe.
              Vail et al., in a series of  papers  (see, for example, Vail et al., 1977), con-
            cluded  from  their  studies  of  the  seismic stratigraphy of  many areas of  the
            world  that  numerous  synchronous,  and  so  global  events  are  recorded  in
            sedimentary  basins around the world. These they interpret as eustatic events.
              Morner (1976) believes that true eustatic changes of sea level are unlikely
            because the geoid is probably unstable even on a short timescale. He pointed
            out that there is a 180 m difference in geoid level over 50"-60"  of longitude
            between  the  Maldive  Islands  (-104  m)  and  New  Guinea  (+76 m  on  the
            Smithsonian Standard Earth I11 geoid map that he used) (Fig. 1-5). An easterly
            drift of the geoid without crustal adjustment would lead to a fall of sea level
            of  about 180 m around New Guinea (which would reunite it with Australia)
            and a rise around the Maldives of about 80 m (which would inundate them).
            Geoid relief  may have been greater in the past,  but the causes of this relief
            are  not  yet  well  understood.  There  is some  similarity  between  the  geoid
            surface and the non-dipole magnetic  field (see Hide and Roberts,  1961, fig.
            2.3b).
              Petroleum  exploration  around  the  world  will  doubtless  clarify  these
            problems  in time as our detailed knowledge and understanding of  sedimen-
            tary basins is extended.



            LITHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONS IN SEDIMENTARY BASINS

              If one considers the sedimentary rocks broadly as mudstone/shales, sands/
            sandstones, and carbonates/evaporites, sedimentary basins tend to accumulate
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41