Page 58 - Petroleum Geology
P. 58

37

            the younger basins of  South-East Asia,  including  Borneo  and  New  Guinea;
            and they occur in Australia. They have received little attention in the literature,
            yet they  are commonly figured. Experience suggests that many of the petro-
            leum-bearing anticlines have a growth component, and that many were initi-
            ated as growth anticlines.
              As  with growth faults, growth anticlines (and other growth structures) are
            best understood  in terms of  differential subsidence relative to baselevel. The
            whole  area  of  the growth anticline was subsiding, but the area of the crest
            was subsiding more slowly than the flank areas. Hence the flank areas had a
            capacity to accumulate a greater thickness  of  sediment. Again, one must see
            the  sediment  as  being in transport  across the area, not deposited from sus-
            pension, because one cannot postulate such patterns of deposition from sus-
            pension.
              Growth  anticlines  range  from  those  that  show  continuity  of  rock units
            across  it, with  differences confined to thickness (and perhaps porosity  and
            permeability), through those that influenced sedimentation to such a degree
            that different facies occurred in the crestal area from the flank areas, to those
            in which rock units are discontinuous across the crestal area. Reservoir rocks
            may therefore vary not only volumetrically,  but also in reservoir properties.
            As with growth faults, these are but variations on a theme of differential sub-
            sidence.
              It is important to bear in mind that the growth of an anticline only affects
            those  sediments  that  were  accumulating  during the  growth  period.  This is
            analogous to the  intermittent  movement  of  a  growth  fault.  All  sediments
            that accumulated in the area prior to the beginning of growth of the anticline,
            and  all  sediments that  accumulated  during periods of  quiescence and after
            growth  had  ceased,  will  show  either  no  thickness  variations,  or  variations
            that  are not related to the structure. This statement requires two qualifica-
            tions:  it applies  to  sediments above  the agent or cause of  growth; and the
            processes  of  compaction tend to prolong the growth, as they do of  growth
            faults. One must therefore  distinguish between the periods of growth on the
            time  scale of  accumulated  sediment,  and  the folding of  sedimentary rocks
            into an anticline subsequently to the accumulation of  the sediment. The time
            or times of  deformation may be revealed by the younger sediments.
              Growth  anticlines  may  be  faulted  by  growth  faults.  The very nature  of
            these requires,  of course, that these are contemporaneous deformations. The
            simultaneous  deformation  of  a  structure  by  folding  and  faulting requires
            careful analysis. Qualitatively, the deformation of  the curved fault plane of a
            growth fault by  contemporaneous growth of the anticline may be important
            in that it sets up stresses that may be relieved by further faulting. Quantita-
            tively, such deformation of  the fault surface may be insignificant because it
            will usually be far finer than the rather coarse control afforded by boreholes.
              The deformation of  a growth anticline by contemporaneous growth fault-
            ing is, of  course, significant in terms of the geometry of the anticline and its
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63