Page 59 - Petroleum Geology
P. 59

38

            reservoirs. The growth component due to faulting may obscure the compo-
            nent due to anticlinal growth, so that the recognition of the growth anticline
            depends on the recognition of  convergence of  stratigraphic units towards the
            crest within fault blocks.
              The  proper  use of isopach  maps and sections is essential for the elucida-
            tion  of  even  simple  growth  structures.  For  instance,  the axis of  minimum
            sediment  accumulation  may  change  position  during the  development  of  a
            growth anticline. Such shifts of position can rarely be seen in structural maps
            or sections.
              We  cannot  leave the subject of  growth anticlines without mention of  an
            alternative  hypothesis  for  the  thinning  of  stratigraphic  units:  that  is,  the
            mechanical attenuation of  the beds due to the enlargement of their area, or
            stretching,  over  a  growing anticline.  Confidence in the sediment-accumula-
            tion hypothesis rests largely on the analogy with growth faults, the evidence
            of  which  is not consistent with mechanical attenuation of  the sedimentary
            rocks because of the abrupt changes of thickness across the fault. Mechanical
            attenuation  is  not  mutually  incompatible  with  sedimentary  thinning,  and
            model  studies have  shown attenuation of  layers over a growing diapir. The
            key to the problem may lie in the thinning of individual beds of similar lithol-
            ogy.  If  mudstones,  for example, show consistent and greater thinning than
            sandstones or limestones,  then  attenuation may be suspected. On the other
            hand, if the patterns of thinning are variable and not associated with lithology,
            sedimentary  thinning may be the dominant cause. The problem  is complex
            and  the evidence ambiguous.  However, when  growth faults cut an anticline
            in which the rock units tend to thin towards the crest, the ambiguity for all
            practical  purposes is removed and at least some of the crestal thinning is due
            to thinner accumulation of sediment there.
              Growth anticlines have hardly ever been reported from surface surveys. It
            is possible that they hardly ever occur at the surface. In active sedimentary
            basins they will, of  course, have no surface expression. In older sedimentary
            basins  where  they  have  been  exposed  by  uplift  and  erosion,  they  will  be
            characterized  by steepening of  dips towards the crest. Such anticlines when
            mapped  may be attributed to diapirism  (and we shall see that diapirism is a
            common cause of  growth anticlines), but the feature of crestal steepening of
            dips is a feature of growth anticlines.



            REFERENCES

            Billings, M.P.,  1954. StructuraZ  geology  (2nd ed.). Prentice  Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,
                 514 pp.
            Bottcher.  H.,  1925. Die Tektonik der Bochumer Mulde zwischen  Dortmund und Bochum
                 und  das Problem  der  westfalischen  Karbonfaltung.  Gliickauf, 61: 1145-1153  and
                 61: 1189-1194.
            Bottcher, H.,  1927. Faltungsformen  und primare Diskordanzen  im niederrheinisch-west-
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64