Page 331 - Petrophysics 2E
P. 331

300    PETROPHYSICS: RESERVOIR ROCK PROPERTIES



                                                TABLE 4.22
                                         BILITH AND TRILITH EQUATIONS

                                            Bilith Equations
                    At = 189$ 4- 43.5vd01 + 8ovsh + 50Vah (acoustic equation)
                    rb = 1.1$ + 2.8Nd01 + 2.65vsh + 2.98Vd (density equation)
                                           Trilith Equations
                    Atc = 189Ifl + 43.51~ + 43.5Vd01 + 55.5vsd + 5OVad (acoustic equation)
                    rb, = 1.1Ifl + 1.11~ + 2.8Nd01 + 2.65vsd 4-  2.98Vad (density equation)
                    $NL = 1 .OIn + 1 .OIQ + 0.06Vd01 + 0.03Vsd + O.01Vah (neutron equation)
                    At = acoustic log input data
                    Q, = density log input data
                    Atc = acoustic log data corrected for shale
                    Q,~ = density log data corrected for shale
                    $NL = neutron log (limestone mode) data corrected for shale
                    $ = porosity
                    If1 = primary porosity index
                    IQ  = secondary porosity index
                    VdOi, Vsh, Vd, Vsd  = percentages of dolomite, shale, anhydrite, and sand,
                      respectively



                                       WEST  HOWARD-GLASSCOCK  UNIT
                                                           Porosity
                                                       30     15     0








                                                    2500






                                                   . 2550   Bltrl -
                                      Gamma  Ray  Log    Cor.  ----

                    Figure 4.55. Agreement of  Bitri-computed porosity  with core-analysis porosity  us.
                    gamma ray log [50].

                    permeability and Biri-computed  permeability.  It was not evident from
                    the report whether core data were shifted a few feet to obtain a better
                    correlation with log data as is recommended by Sneider et al. [52]. Also,
                    it was not reported whether the core data were corrected for the effects
                    of overburden pressure  [53].
   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336