Page 548 - Petrophysics
P. 548

PETROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES            515


                           (c)  Using Equation 8.19b:


                              kf = 1.5 x  107@t [(l - Swi)FII]2.63
                                 = 1.5 x lo7 (0.17) [(l - 0.24)0.1417]2.63 = 7,265 mD


                              Using equation 8.20, where CT = 3/4, the fracture porosity is:
                              Qf  = [Rd (& - &)IcT         = b.165 (A - -$)I  314  = 0.0358







                              For CT = 2/3, the fracture porosity is 0.052; thus the value of  @f is
                              between 0.036 and 0.052.
                              The matrix porosity is:

                              Qm = @t(l - U) = 0.17(1 - 0.165)  0.142


                              Note that the sum of  Qf (for CT  = 3/4)  and @m is 0.177, which is
                              approximately equal to the total porosity obtained from well logs.
                              Therefore the fracture porosity of this reservoir is 3.6%.

                    PERMEABILITY-POROSITY RELATIONSHIPS IN  DOUBLE POROSITY SYSTEMS


                             Petroleum reservoirs can be divided into three broad classes based on
                           their porosity systems:

                           (1)  intergranular;
                           (2)  intercrystalline-intergranular;
                           (3)  solution channels and/or natural fractures.

                             Reservoirs with vugular solution channels and/or fractures differ from
                           those  having intercrystalline-intergranular porosity in  that  the  double
                           porosity system strongly influences the movement of fluids. The double
                           porosity can be the result of fractures, joints, and/or solution channels
                           within  the  reservoirs.  Carbonate  reservoirs  with  a  vugular-solution
                           porosity system, such as the Pegasus Ellenburger Field and Canyon Reef
                           Field in Texas, exhibit a wide range of  permeability. The permeability
                           distribution may  be  relatively uniform  or quite irregular. The double
                           porosity  reservoir  with  a  uniform  permeability  distribution  can  be
                           analyzed as follows.
                             Consider  a  rock  sample with  two dominant  pore  radii,  as  shown
                           in  Figure  8.14. The  total  flow  through  such  systems is  the  sum  of
   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553