Page 289 - Phase Space Optics Fundamentals and Applications
P. 289

270   Chapter Eight


               where in the second step the integration-by-parts trick in Eq. (8.91)
               was used to remove the  ’s. This means that the variation of SAFE’s
               estimate due to changes of the contributions’ widths is asymptotically
               small, provided that a 0 is chosen to be independent of  . This is the
               reason for the name of the method: while each of the contributions (or
               “elements”) is flexible in width, their superposition (or “aggregate”)
               is stable.


               8.9.3 Phase-Space Interpretation
               Insight into SAFE and the insensitivity of the estimate on   (as well
               as the limitations of this insensitivity) can be gained through a phase-
               space picture. The windowed Fourier transform (WFT) like the one de-
               fined in Eq. (1.86) is a linear phase-space representation of a function.
               Here, let us consider a WFT where the window is chosen as a Gaussian
               of width (k ) −1/2  (with   > 0):

                                     k  1/2              (x − x) 2


                       S f (x, p;  ) =      f (x ) exp −k
                                      2                     2
                                                  x
                                        !           "

                                  × exp −ikp x −      dx           (8.101)
                                                  2
               The squared modulus of this transform is known as the spectrogram or
               Husimi function. 46  The application of this transformation to the field
               estimate in Eq. (8.98) gives
                  (x, p; z,  )
                S U
                   9
                       k  1/2        X + iP          (x − X) 2   ( p − P) 2

                 =              a 0         exp −k   −1    −1  − k
                     2 (  +  )         H           2(   +   )    2(  +  )
                                !                              "
                             ik          p            x
                   × exp −        x P −     −  p X −     −  XP    d
                             +           2            2
                                                                   (8.102)
               That is, the contribution from each ray is a Gaussian (times a linear
               phase factor) localized around the corresponding phase-space point,
                              
                               √
                                       −1
               with rms widths  (  −1  +   )/2k in the x direction and  (  +  )/2k
               in the p direction, as shown in Fig. 8.6a. This leads to the following
               intuitive picture illustrated in Fig. 8.6b: the evaluation of Eq. (8.102) is
               like spray-painting the wave field’s phase-space distribution over the
               rays’ traced line (the PSC). The characteristic footprint of the spray
               can has the widths mentioned earlier. However, the appearance of
               the final thicker fuzzy line painted over the PSC is roughly indepen-
               dent of the widths of the footprint, 47  as long as this footprint is fine
               enough to resolve the sections of the PSC where the curvature is tight.
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294