Page 164 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 164

CULTURAL LOGICS AND NATIONAL       IDENTITIES        157

                             III.  Identity  and  Modem  Globalization

              Modernizing  globalization  purports  to  institute  a  universal  and  leveling
              cultural  design  that  seems  to  threaten  cultural  differences  and,  within
              their  context,  national  identities.  The  previously  mentioned  scholars  have
              a  variety  of  answers  to  this  issue,  especially  in  the  current  talk  of
              modernization.  Although  there  are  dynamic  processes,  such  as  economic
              capitalization  and  technical  improvements,  secularization,  democratization,
              and  even  laxity  in  human  relationships,  a  fear  may  arise  not  only  of
              homogenization, but  above  all  of  total  dissolution  of  any  guide  posts  for
              human  life.  Sorokin*s  binary  and  sequential  recurrences  of  symbolic
              designs  yield  no  clues  concerning  modernization  that  are  secular,
              developmental,  and  simultaneously  sensate-material  and  quantitatively
              ideational. After  all, homogenization of  the cultural environment  combines
              mathematical  ideality  and  atomistic  materiality.  Moreover,  it  is  difficult  to
              find  even  generalities  within  his  framework  that  would  distinguish  among
              cultural  designs.  He  would  add  very  httle  to  the  current  quest  both  for
              cultural  and  national  identities  and  the  efforts  to  rediscover  or  to  invent
              such  identities.  In  the  context  of  modern  dissolution  of  distances  and  a
              creation  of  interdependencies,  if  these  units  are  to  be  identified,  they
              might  lose  the  identities  which  were  possible  when  they  maintained
             greater  isolation  from  each  other.
                Eisenstadt's  binary  logic  of  transcendence  and  secularity,  which  allows
              for  their  mixture,  fails  to  recognize  that  modern  secularism  contains  its
              own transcendence—mathematical  ideaUty and  atomistic  materiaUty—with-
              out  ceasing  to  be  this-worldly.  In  addition,  his  thesis  offers  no  clues
              concerning  the  dynamics  of  transformations,  such  as  Gebserian  magi-
              cal-vital awareness. Gebser  allows  for  a  multi-layered  and  multi-directional
              analyses  and  a  possibility  of  crises  that  integrate  postmodernity  and  even
              antimodernity.  It  was  noted  elsewhere  that  the  freedom  of  modern
              signitive  symbolizations  allow  for  separation  of  institutional  spheres.^*
              Despite  the  superficial  occultistic  show,  the  contemporary  West  does  not
              follow  the  solution  of  the  transcendence-secularity  tension  by  a  "mixed"
              model,  but  is,  in  the  main,  secular.  The  efforts  to  weave  sacrality  into
              practical  life  have  failed  even  in  the  Soviet  Union's  play  with  Marxism
              as  one  form  of  sacrality.



                ^* S.Eisenstadt,/?evo/M/ton  and the Transformation of Societies: A  Comparative Study
             of Civilizations (New York: The Free Press, 1978), 322ff.
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169