Page 162 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 162

CULTURAL LOGICS AND NATIONAL IDENTITIES                155

                What  lends  this  shift  from  presentation  to  representation,  and  then  to
              signification,  its  dynamics,  its  flux?  We  must  find  an  account  for  its
              sudden explosion  that  promises,  in  literal  terms,  globalizing  Macdonaliza-
              tion  of  cultural  diversities,  provoking  Jihadic  opposition  by  fervent
              nationalisms,  ethnocentrisms,  and  their  attendant  archaizations.  First,  the
              choice  of  a  specific  signitive  language  is  not  innocent.  Since  modern
              signification  has  no vertical  nexus,  it  must be  technical  in  order  to  access
              the  world,  i.e.,  definitory  of  the  object  and  at  the  same  time  providing
              the  rules  for  constructing the  object.  As  Husserl  had  noted,  mathematiza-
              tion  is  a  technique.^^  If  one  were  to  assume  the  classical  Platonism  where
              mathematics  is  metaphysical  presence,  then  the  modern  conception  of
              mathematics  as  signitive  construction  of  the  world  could  be  called,  with
              Volkmann-Schluck,  metaphysics  gone  wild.^^  This  is  to  say,  there  being
              neither  presence  of  the  world  nor  its  representation,  one  can  signify  the
              world  at  will.  In  this  sense,  the  mathematical,  signitive  reason,  turns  out
              to  be  instrumental  at  the  service  of  will.  The  latter  is  the  modern  nomad
              that  can  resignify  all  events  in  accordance  with  its  wants  and  arbitrari-
              ness,  leading  to  the  well  known  primacy  of  power  for  the  sake  of  power.
                The  logic of  power  is  its self-incrementation.  Unchecked  by the vertical
              presence  of  the  world—the  intentionaUty  that  requires  respect  for
              quahtative  differences  imbedded  in  symbohc  designs—the  metaphysics  of
             will  has  no  other  object  apart  from  increasing  power.^^ This  is  the  magic
              of  modernity  that  subtends  reason  and,  resultantly,  constitutes  the  ground
              of  postmodernity within  modernity. All  events  can be  signified  at will,  and
              produce  instrumentally  through  human  signification.  Yet  at  another  level
              this  constitutes  a  catalyst  for  the  modern  emphasis  on  individuality  and
              for  democratization.  It  is  to  be  noted  that  this  modern  level  is  invoked
              by  nationalistic  and  ethnocentric  movements,  each  demanding  "freedom"
              to  decide  its  own  life  and  destiny—^while  using  modern  technical  means
              to  obtain  it  in  a  holy  war  for  the  sacred  lands  of  mythical  ancestors.
                Given  this  background  of  postmodernity  within  modernity,  the  current
              proliferation  of  postmodern  theses  can  make  some  sense.  Postmoderns




                ^^ Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomeno-
             logy, translated  by D.  Carr (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), 23ff.
                ^^  Karl-Heinz  Volkmann-Schluck,  Einfuehrung  in  das  Philosophische  Denken
             (Frankfurt  am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1965), 59ff.
                ^^  Karl-Heinz  Volkmann-Schluck,  PoUtisches Philosophic  (Frankfurt  am  Main:
             Vittorio Klostermann, 1974).
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167