Page 17 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 17

10                      LESTER   EMBREE

              and  of  course  the  suggestion  urged  here  is  that  the  word  "cuhure"
              replace  the  word  "human" just  as  the  word  "discipline''  replace  the  word
              "science,"  so  that  "cultural  discipline(s)"  replace  "human  science(s)."  It
              may  be  best  now  to  urge  the  proposed  expression  directly.
                To  begin  with,  "cultural  discipline"  readily  designates  "disciplines
              concerned  with  cultural  matters,"  whereas  "cultural  discipline"  as
              "discipline  that  is  cultural"  is  unhelpful  because  it  is  difficult  to  see  how
              there  might  be  a  non-cultural  combination of  cultural  practices.  In  other
              words,  all  disciplines  as  such  are  cultural  by virtue  of  being  made  up  of
              learned  practices  even  if  not  all  of  them  are  cultural  by  virtue  of  that
             which  is  dealt  with  in  them!  How  the  matters  or  objects  addressed  in
              cultural  disciplines  are  cultural  will  be  returned  to  presently.  On  the
              linguistic  level,  it  would  furthermore  seem  that  the  expression  "cultural
              discipline(s)"  is  readily  translatable  into  at  least  the  Western  European
              languages.  But  clearly  the  principal  advantage  of  "cultural  discipline"  is
              the  inclusion  of  the  worlds  of  non-humans  among  the  cultural  matters
              investigated  and  otherwise  related  to  and  thus  the  inclusion  of  at  least
              primate  ethology  (and  conservation)  among  the  cultural  disciplines.^^
                Research  on  chimpanzees,  bonobos,  and  gorillas  has  now  shown  that
             they  are  the  most  similar  of  known  non-humans  to  humans  in  anatomy
             and  behavior.  The  behavioral  affinities  include  "friendship,  love,  aggres-
             sion,  language,  and  tool  use."^^ Chimpanzees  specifically  can  comprehend
             human  language  better  than  human  two-year-olds,  use  plants  as  medicin-
             es,  use  stones  and  sticks  to  crack  nuts  and  collect  insects  and  teach  these



                  ^^ Cf.  W.  C.  McGrew,  Chimpanzee  Material  Culture  (Cambridge:  Cambridge
              University  Press,  1992).  Adding  two  to  those  Alfred  Krober  proposed  in  1928  (in
             reflection  on  KGhler's  work),  McGrew  proposes  the  following  eight  criteria,  the
             whole  set  of  which  would  need  to  be  met  for  "recognizing  cultural  acts  in  other
             species"  (except  for  the  last  two, which  do  not  apply  to  humans  beyond  the  foraging
              type  of  life-way,  these  are  met  by  lawnmowing!):
                Innovation         New  pattern  is  invented  or  modified
                Dissemination      Pattern  acquired  by  another  from  innovator
                Standardisation    Form  of  pattern  is  consistent  and  stylised
                Durability         Pattern  performed  without  presence  of  demonstrator
                Diffusion          Pattern  spreads fi*om one  group  to  another
                Tradition          Pattern  persists  from  innovator's  generation  to  next  one
                Non-Subsistence    Pattern  transcends  subsistance
                Naturalness        Pattern  shown  in  absence  of  direct  human  influence
                  ^^  Eugene  Linden,  "A  Curious  Kinship:  Apes  and  Humans,"  National
             Geographic,  181  (1992),  10.  Cf.  Eugene  Linden,  "Bonobos,  Chimpanzees  with  a
             Difference,"  idem.
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22