Page 18 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 18

REFLECTION    ON   THE  CULTURAL   DISCIPLINES         11

              technologies  to  their  young,  hunt  individually  and  in  groups  and  bring
              back  meat  to  share  with  the  larger  group,  engage  in  warfare  as  well  as
              murder  and  infanticide,  vary  by  group  culturally  inasmuch  as  different
              groups  exploit  different  resources  in  similar  ecosystems,  and,  as  the
              television  programs  of  Jane  Goodall  show,  have  definitely  individual
              personalities.  There  are  now even  questions  concerning  how  to  distinguish
              archaeologically  between  what  are  very  early  human  sites  and  what  may
              actually  be  early  chimpanzee  sites!  Plainly,  these  apes  engage  in  cultural
              practices  at  least  like  those  classified  as  amateur  above.
                Phenomenological  interest  in  the  anthropoid  apes  goes  back  to  the
              early  work  of  Gurwitsch,  who  was  responding  to  research  by  the  Gestalt
              psychologists,  especially  K5hler,  into  the  practical  problem-solving
              intelligence  that  chimpanzees  and  humans  share.^^  This  would  seem  part
              of  the  structure  common  not  only  to  the  anthropoid  apes  and  human
              infants,  but  also  the  brain-injured  adults  investigated  by  Gelb  and
              Goldstein,  the  so-called  primitive  humans  investigated  by  L6vy-Bruhl,  and
              "the  practical  attitude  of  normal  [human]  subjects.**^^  Altogether,
              Gurwitsch  presents  the  world  of  the  natural  attitude  (of  humans,  although
              probably  subhumans  have  only  this  attitude)  as  originally  practical  and
              habitual  and  made  up  of  situations  filled  with  interrelated  functional  or
              practical  objects  (A  chimpanzee  world  is  cultural  in  these  terms):


                   The  life-world  is  essentially  a  socio-historical,  that  is  a  cultural,  world.  In
                the  life-world  we  do  not  encounter—at  least  not  in  the  first  place—mere
                corporeal  objects,  pure  perceptual  things, which  can  be  exhaustively  described
                in  terms of  what  traditionally  are  called  primary  and  secondary  qualities. What
                we  encounter  are  cultural  objects,  objects of  value,  e.g.,  works  of  art,  buildings
                which  serve  specific  purposes,  like  abodes,  places  for  work,  schools,  libraries,
                churches,  and  so  on.  Objects  pertaining  to  the  life-world  present  themselves
                as  tools,  instruments,  and  utensils  related  to  human  needs  and  desires;  they
                have  to  be  handled  and  used  in  appropriate  ways  to  satisfy  those  needs  and
                                    .
                to  yield  desired  results . . .  It  is  the  specific  sense  of  their  instrumentality
                which essentially  defines  these  objects  and  makes  them  be  what  they  are,  that


                  ^^  "Some  Aspects  and  Developments  of  Gestalt  Psychology"  (1936),  translated
              by  Richard  Zaner  in  Aron  Gurwitsch,  Studies  in  Phenomenology  and  Psychology
              (Evanston,  111.: Northwestern  University  Press,  1966),  50-52.
                  ^^  Aron  Gurwitsch, Phenomenology  and  the  Theory  of Science, edited  by Lester
              Embree  (Evanston,  111.:  Northwestern  University  Press,  1974),  171  n.  23.  In  The
             Structure of  Behavior,  translated  by  Alden  Fischer,  (Boston:  Beacon  Press,  1963),
              113-128,  Maurice  Merleau-Ponty  also  reflected  at  length  on  anthropoid  life.
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23