Page 183 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 183

176                     ULLRICH   MELLE

              Tokar,  a  writer  on  Green  politics  and  thought:  "The  further  the  earth's
              ecosystems,  our health  and our personal  lives  are  degraded  by technologi-
              cal  progress,  the  more  our  civilization  becomes  dependent  upon
              technological  solutions  to  try  to  manipulate  its  way  out  of  the  mess  that
              has  been  created."^^
                Edward  Goldsmith,  the  editor  of  the  renowned  British  journal  The
              Ecologist, radically  opposes  this  "more-of-the-same"  strategy.  He  sees  a
              radical  and  irreconcilable  opposition  between  the  technosphere  and  the
              biosphere,  so  that  "the  ethic  of  perpetual  technospheric  expansion  is  in
              reality  no  more  than  an  ethic  of  biospheric  destruction."^^  According  to
              Goldsmith,  humankind  can  only  survive  and  the  true  needs  of  humans
              can  only  be  satisfied  as  long  as  humans  are  an  integral  part  of  Gaia,
              fulfilling  their  assigned  role  in  the  Gaian  hierarchy.  The  Gaian  ecosphere
              is  a  highly  co-operative,  self-regulating,  self-sustaining  enterprise,  which
              maximizes  its  own  stabiUty  and  realizes  the  optimal  conditions  of  living
              for  all  of  its  natural  parts,  the  human species  included. There  exists  then
              an  identity  of  interests  between  humanity  and  Gaia.  For  Goldsmith  "it  is
              the  fundamental  flaw  of  the  world-view  of  modernism  to  ignore  this
              perennial  truth. "^'  Only  as  vernacular  manAvoman  in  endemic
             societies—this  is  Goldsmith's  radical  and  controversial  claim—are  humans
             supportive  and  supported  members  of  Gaian  hierarchy.
                The  project of  technospheric transformation  and expansion  is  grounded
             on  what  Goldsmith  calls  the  world-view  of  modernism,  the  great
             misinterpretation,  which  postulates  a  thrifty  nature  that  first  has  to  be
             made  productive  by  human  science,  technology  and  industry  before  it
             yields  the  benefits  required  for  cultural  development.  The  result  of  this
             great  misinterpretation.  Goldsmith  maintains,  was  the  creation  of  a
             technospheric  surrogate-world,  which  is  radically  at  variance  with  human
             nature.  "As  economic  development  proceeds,  man  is  thereby  condemned
             to  living  in  a  world  to  which  he  is  ever  less  well  adapted  biologically.






                  ^^  Brian  Tokar,  "Social  Ecology,  Deep  Ecology  and  the  Future  of  the  Green
             Political  Thought,"  in:  The Ecologist  10.4/5  (1988),  140.
                  ^^ Edward  Goldsmith,  "Towards  a  Biospheric  Ethic,"  in:  The Ecologist  19.4/5
             (1989),  74.
                  ^' Edward  Goldsmith,  "The  Way: An  Ecological  Worldview,"  in:  The Ecologist
             10.4/5  (1988),  168.
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188