Page 206 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 206

PHENOMENOLOGY AND ECOFEMINISM                     199

              management  of  a  household.  *Home  economics' is  really  redundant  Is  it
              not  an  anomaly  that  economics  has  lost  sight  of  that  part  of  itself  to
              which  women  have  traditionally  contributed  more  than  their  share?  Now
              economics  thinks  of  the  household  in  terms  of  the  grocery  store  shelves.
              It  has  not  yet  accepted  its  role  in  regard  to  the  household  which  is  the
              biosphere.
                Hierarchical  thinking led  to  the  "logic of  domination." It was  taken  for
              granted  that  the  higher  had  a  right,  or  even  a  duty,  to  dominate  the
              lower.  So  males,  who  were  assumed  to  be  more  rational  and  were
              engaged  in  important  matters  of  culture,  dominated  females,  who  were
              engaged  in  matters  of  nature  such  a  childbirth  and  nurturing  activities,
              activities  which  required  little  use  of  reason.  This  "logic''  was  based  on
              faulty  assessments  of  value  and  on  a  questionable  ethical  principle,  but
              this  did  not  prevent  it  from  having  powerful  effects  upon  human
              relationships  and  upon  the  way  nonhuman  animals  and  natural  things
              were  treated.  Until  very  recently  very  few  people  thought  that  humans
              had  any  direct  moral  responsibility  to  nonhuman  lives  or  to  the  system
              of  nature.  Only  human  interests  determined  the  right  uses  of  nonhuman
              entities,  and  atomistic  thinking  greatly  limited  understanding  of  human
              interest.  Only a  few  people  of  remarkable  insight realized  that destruction
              of  natural  things  diminished  human  life.  Few  were  the  people  who
              realized  that  the  domination  of  women  diminished  human  life.
                Before  we  leave  this  matter  let  me  make  an  important  point.  The
              objection  to  hierarchical  thinking  on  the  part  of  ecological  feminists  is
              not  the  insupportable  rejection  of  all  judgment  of  relative  worth  which
              some  superficial  thinkers  might  support  Warren  makes  it  very  clear  that
              she  is  not  rejecting  all  judgment of  worth.  It  is  within  the  context  of  the
              "logic  of  domination'' that  judgment becomes  vicious.  What  happened  in
              specific  cases  of  injustice  was  that  biased  judgment  was  based  on
              inadequate  knowledge.  In  general  the  fault  in  hierarchical  thinking  is
              limiting  thought  to  the  relationships  of  superior  to  inferior,  which
              obscures other  important  relationships. For example,  in  the  context of  the
              working  of  natural  systems,  the  decomposers,  which  are  the  small  and
              usually not very  attractive  insects,  worms,  and  bacteria  which  break  down
              dead  organisms  into  their  constituent  materials,  are  at  least  as  necessary
              to  the  system  of  nature  as  the  larger  members  of  the  system.  Even
              though we  place  more  value  on  our  fellow  humans,  there  is  a  sense  in
              which  a  decomposer  is  no  less  important  than  a  human.  The  significant
              point  is  that  a  judgment  of  relative  value  is  useless  in  this  context
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211