Page 266 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 266

TECHNOLOGY AND        CULTURAL    REVENGE            259

                And  image  technologies  have  become  multipliers  in  another  sense  as
              well.  They  are  the  everyday  equivalents  of  cubism,  surrealism,  and  the
              Picasso  style  of  multiple  perspectives  within a  single  scan  or  frame.  Here
              the  multi-screen  or  the  television  control  rooms  are  good  examples.
              Instead  of  one  single  screen,  multiple  screens  are  situated  side  by  side.
              It  is  a  "compound  vision"  but  not  di-optic  as  in  the  multiple  eyes  of
              insects  which  have  many  lenses  upon  the  same  referent—here  there  is a
              multiplicity  of  referents.  This,  too,  is  a  kind  of  bricolage  which  the
              technical  editor—in  the  case  of  the  TV  control  room—or  the  viewer,
              "composes,"  sorts  out,  selects  in  a  usually  fast  and  changing  movement,
              what  will  be  foregrounded  and  "revealed,"  and  what  will  be  left  out  or
              "concealed."
                All  of  these  technologies are  familiar,  part  of a  now ordinary lifeworld.
              With  and  through  them  we  are  now  ready  to  note  how  contemporary
              cross-culture  is  technologically  mediated  as  "pluriculture."
                First,  cultures  (plural)  are  daily  present.  The  international  portion  of
              the  television  news  displays  Middle  Eastern, Asian,  Irish, varieties  of  both
              Eastern  and  Western  European  culture-bits  virtually  every  night.  Old
              fashioned  magazines  and  books,  too,  often  combine  these  culture
              fragments—as  particularly  the  National  Geographic  in  Anglophone
             countries.
                Nor  is  the  multicultural  presence  restricted  to  imagery—it  is  material-
             ized  in  other  practices,  (a)  Cuisines  are  good  examples—every  interna-
             tional  city  has  a  range  of  restaurants  other  than  local  or  national  and
             these  have  multiplied  in  the  last  few  decades,  (b)  Fashions, which  belong
             to  cultural  semiotic  systems,  take  their  lead,  not  only  from  traditional
             centers  such  as  New  York  or  Paris  or  Rome,  but  from  Tokyo,  Hong
             Kong,  with  fashion  borrowings  from  virutally  every  culture—African
             dashikis,  Nehru jackets,  modified  Samurai  warrior  padding,  para-military,
             American  cowboy—all  are  part  of  the  plurifashion  presence,  (c)  Even
             religions  take  on  this  culture  fragment  appearance.  In  "Christian" Europe
             one  finds  small  groups  of  convertees  to  Hari  Krishna,  Islam,  Buddhism,
             even  tribal  or  witchcraft  revivals.
                I  have  already  noted  in  the  multiple  presence  of  cultures  that  they
             often  appear  as  culture  fragments.  These  are also  mixed  in dizzying  forms
             of  bricoleur  eclectic.  Nouvelle  cuisine  is  French  with  an  Oriental  touch;
             Japanese  "Samurai"  fashion  is  high  modern  plus  traditional;  Bahai  is
             Hindu  with  Christian  forms  absorbed  into  it.  There  is  a  kind  of  center
             of  gravity  which  is  that  of  culture  bricolage  within  pluriculture.
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271