Page 32 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 32

REFLECTION     ON  THE CULTURAL      DISCIPLINES         25

              c  The  Axiotic  Disciplines.

              That  there  are  theoretical  and practical  disciplines  that can be  considered
              cultural  qua  combinations of  skilled  practices  bearing  on  objects  that  are
              neither  naturalized  nor  formalized  is  probably  not  difficult  to  accept,  but
              as  the  sketch  of  landscape  architecture  in  relation  to  amateur  and  crafty
              engagements  in  lawn-mowing  above  intimates,  there  seem  to  be  cultural
              disciplines  of a  third sort  that culminate  neither  in cognition  nor in  action
              but  rather  in  valuing  and values.  These  may be  called  **value disciplines"
              on occasions when  the  more  technical-sounding "axiotic disciplines" would
              not  communicate  as  well.  Analogously,  there  may  be  occasions  when  it
              is  better  to  speak  of  "knowledge  disciplines"  and  "action  disciplines."
              Disciplines  of  aU  three  sorts  are  combinations  of  cultural  practices
              themselves  as  well  as  related  to  cuhural  matters.  Thus, while  the  mowing
              of  lawns  is  not  a  practice  that  the  landscape  architect  performs,  it  is  a
              practice,  specifically  a  maintenance  practice,  necessary,  for  some,  to  a
              beautiful  landscape,  so  that  a  landscape  including  lawns  in a  lawn-appre-
              ciating  society  is  less  beautiful  if  maintenance  of  this  sort  is  not
              performed  and  hence  the  architect  needs  to  know  about, value,  and  plan
              for  it  in  her  landscaping  projects.  Cultural  discipUnes  combine  many
              cultural  practices.
                Enough  may have been conveyed  above  positively  about how there  are
              positive  and  negative  values  that  can  also  be  intrinsic  or  extrinsic,  how
              these  are  constituted  in  the  pathic  or  valuing  stratum  of  intentive  Ufe,
              how  this  stratum  is  a  non-self-sufficient  positional  part  of  the  pertinent
              intentive  process  or  concrete  cultural  practice,  and  how  values  can  be
              reflectively  differentiated  and  described  when  objects  as  intended  to  are
              reflectively  observed.  This  analysis  may  help  any  who  hesitate  about  an
              approach  that  takes  axiotic  crafts  and  discipUnes  seriously  and  notes  that
              they  relate  not  only  to  refined  appreciation  by  esthetes  but  also  to
              enjoyment,  pleasure,  even  fun,  etc.,  and  additionally  the  negative  and
              neutral  opposites  of  them.  "Positive  valuing"  is  a  more  technical  term
              than  "liking," negative  valuing  is  disliking,  and  then  there  is  apathy.  And
              an enormous amount of valuing, whatever  the  modaUty, is  deeply  habitual
              or,  in  other  words,  cultural.  (It  also  deserves  mention  that  the  value
              characteristics  of  objects  as  they  present  themselves  are  not  the  same  as
              the  monetary  prices  that  some  objects  have  in  commerce.)
                For  many,  *Value" is  what  talk  about  "culture" chiefly  connotes.  From
             within a  social  group values  often  seem  all  utterly  unlearned  or  "natural"
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37