Page 43 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 43

36                      LESTER   EMBREE

              centrally with cultural phenomena, namely,  Cognitive Science, and Richard
              Zaner  continues  his  long-term  project  of  reflection  on  medicine.
                It  seems  more  Ukely  that  the  mentioned  figures  would  accept  that
              their  philosophizing about culture  generally  proceeds  through a  considera-
              tion  of  cultural  worlds  in  relation  to  work  of  specialized  disciplinary
              approaches  than  it  seems  that  they  would  readily  accept  the  taxonomy
              oflfered  above  for  these  disciplines.  Nevertheless,  while  there  might  be
              disagreements  about  how  to  distinguish  them,  it  would  seem  difficult  to
              deny  that  medicine  and  technology  are practical  disciplines^^  or  that  most
              of  the  other  chapters  chiefly  rely  on cultural sciences?^  Husserl's  views  on
              religion  presented  by  Hart  presents  an  interesting  case:  Are  religious
              practices  cognitive,  practical,  or  axiotic?  Certainly,  all  three  components
              are  to  be  found  in  them,  but  which  one  predominates?  And  is  the
              combination  of  practices  of  advanced  preparation  provided  in  Religion
              Departments  and  divinity  schools  a  theoretical,  an  axiotic,  or  a  practical
              discipline?  The  same  questions  can  be  asked  about  environmental,
              ecofeminist,  ethnic studies  and other  practices  and disciplines, and  if  these
              are  decided  to  be  either  practical  or  theoretical  in  their  culminations,
              what  of  architecture,  alluded  to  above,  and  other  fine  arts  phenomenol-
              ogical  work  on  which  is,  unfortunately,  not  represented  in  this  volume?
                Whether  or  not  attempting  to  relate  their  efforts  to  the  trifurcation  of
              the  cultural  discipUnes  would  be  helpful  for  the  phenomenology  of  the
              cultural  disciplines  is  for  the  mentioned  authors  and  other  readers  to
              decide  in word  and deed.  If some  phenomenologists concerned with  some
              cultural  discipUnes  consider  the  efforts  of  others,  which  has  happened,
              then  the  further  question  can  be  asked  of  whether  it  is  at  the  amateur,
              crafty,  or  disciplinary  level,  which  reduces  to  a  question  of  the  degree  of
              preparation  in  the  form  of  close  study  of  the  efforts  of  others,  i.e.,  the
              keeping  up with,  e.g.,  Carr's  work  on  history,  Ihde's  work  on  technology.




                   ^^  Cf.  also  S.  Kay Toombs,  The Meaning of Illness; A  Phenomenological Account
              of  the  Different Perspectives of  Physician and  Patient  (Dordrecht:  Kluwer  Academic
              Publishers,  1992).  Furthermore,  see  Anne  H.  Bishop  and  John  R.  Scudder, Nursing:
              The  Practice  of  Caring  (New  York:  National  League  for  Nursing  Press,  1991)
              pertains  to  another  practical  discipline  and  shows  that  at  least  bi-disciplinary  efforts
              can  work.
                  ^^  Recent  work  by  Gary  Madison  relative  to  another  cultural  science,  namely
              economics,  can  also  be  mentioned,  e.g.,  "Beyond  Theory  and  Practice:  Hayek  on  the
              Logic  of  Cultural  Dynamics,"  Cultural Dynamics  3  (1990).
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48