Page 86 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 86

PHENOMENOLOGY      AND  COGNITIVE   SCIENCE          79

                     moving:  to  mechanics,  calculus,  dynamics
                     calculating:  to  algebra,  numerical  analysis
                     proving:  to  logic
                     puzzling:  to  combinatorics,  number  theory
                     grouping:  to  set  theory,  combinatorics

                Having  listed  these  different  human  activities  Mac  Lane  notes  their
              interrelationships:  "These  various  human  activities  are  by  no  means
              completely  separate;  indeed,  they  interact  with  each  other  in  complex
              ways  .  .  .  .The  two  parts  of  this  table  should  (and  do)  fit  together  by
              many  crosslinks"  (Lakoff,  1987,  p.  362).
                The  sorts  of  relationships  that  we  normally  think  of  as  relationships
              holding among  formal  mathematical  terms,  such  as  symmetry,  asymmetry,
              or  transitivity,  turn  out  to  be  rooted  and  ah*eady  exhibited  in  the  more
              basic  human  activities  that  generate  these  mathematical  formations.
              Sequences  of  human  actions  are  already  symmetrical,  asymmetrical,  etc.
              As  Mac  Lane  says,  mathematical  systems  "codify  deeper  and  nonobvious
              properties  of  the  originating  human  activities"  (Lakoff,  1987,  p.  362).
              Mathematical  formations  thus  always  retain  within  themselves  what
              phenomenologists  would  call  their  "meaning-genesis":  the  forms  of  the
             activities  that  generate  mathematical  formations  remain  embedded  within
             these  higher-level  formations,  only  now  emptied  of  content,  i.e.,  formal-
             ized.
                Lakoff  summarizes  Mac  Lane's  position  in  the  following  way:

                     Mac  Lane  claims  that  the  branches  of  mathematics  are  as  they  are
                     because  they  arise  from  human  activities  that  each  have  a  general
                     schematic  structure,  made  up  of  various  substructures,  or  "basic  ideas."
                     These  basic  ideas  both  occur  in  the  structure  of  the  human  activities
                     that  give  rise  to  the  various  branches  of  mathematics  (and  in  these
                     branches  of  mathematics  themselves).  Mathematics  describes  them  and
                     their  connections  and  interrelationships  in  an  absolutely  rigorous way (p.
                     362).


                Mac  Lane's  position  here  resembles  Husserl's  in  "The  Origin  of
             Geometry."  Husserl  claims  that  the  "meaning-genesis" of  geometry  lies  in
             the  idealization  and  formalization  of  certain  human  activities.  Husserl
             mentions  in  particular  the  activities  of  estimating,  measuring,  designing
             buildings, and  surveying  fields  (1970,  p. 376).  Geometry  thus  had  its  roots
             in  everyday  practical  life,  not  in  pure  theory.  As  Husserl  writes,  "in  the
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91