Page 43 - Pipeline Pigging Technology
P. 43

Pipeline  Pigging  Technology


     work done in the aerospace industry, it is also not surprising that they have
      been  successful in this role.
        Although  HRE  was  also  one  of  the  pioneers  of  this  method,  a  lot  of
     development  has recently been done by Pigco Pipeline Services in Canada on
      its  "Geopig" (Fig.4). As with  most modern  ILI tools,  the  technology is very
      advanced, and a very detailed description of the Geopig was given in a recent
     paper[31 (see pages 343-364).
        The  heart  of the  system is a  "strapdown  inertial  measurement unit"  or
      SIMU. This contains both accelerometers and gyros which, when  coupled,
     provide  input  for  computing  pipeline  curvature,  the  orientation  of  that
      curvature, and its position.
        The  SIMU is installed inside the  pig body, which in turn is supported  on
      elastomer drive discs. Although this ensures that the  SIMU will travel in close
      approximation to the  centreline of the  pipe,  it is recognized that the  pig's
     pitch  and  heading will  not  coincide  with  the  slope  and  azimuth  of  the
     pipeline. The pig is therefore fitted with  a ring of sonars  at each  end of the
      inertial system, to provide constant readings of the pig-to-pipe attitude.
        Odometer wheels are used for distance measurement, and the instrumen-
      tation  also  provides  for  the  measurement  and  recording  of  the  pipeline
      geometry such as diameter reductions, etc.
        Large amounts of data are gathered, and it was quickly recognized that hard
      copy was, in effect,  unmanageable. Instead, a PC software package has been
      developed  with the data contained on an optical disc. This allows for rapid
      retrieval or manipulation of the information, and effectively eliminates errors
      in  interpretation.

        Visual inspection



        Photographic

        The results obtained  by some of the  early ILI tools were  often  (and with
      some  justification)  regarded  with  scepticism,  and  it  was  felt  that  visual
      confirmation of a particular feature would be helpful. However, pictures can
      only be obtained in good visibility, which limits the use of this technique to
      relatively-clean, clear gas or liquids. In addition, the information provided by
      ILI tools quickly became more detailed and reliable, so there was no need for
      visual inspection to confirm  the results. These factors combined to limit the
      use of visual  inspection.
        There are still, though,  many situations where a visual inspection can be
      very useful. One  area in particular is for inspecting the  condition  of linings,

                                       24
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48