Page 253 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 253

11/230 Distribution Systems
            Score the potential for atmospheric  corrosion as shown in   highly localized corrosive conditions. In a city environment,
          Chapter 4.                                 the  high  number  of  construction  projects  leaves  open  the
                                                     opportunity  for many  different materials  to be used  as fill,
          Internal corrosion                         foundation, road base, etc. Some of these materials may pro-
                                                     mote corrosion by acting as a strong electrolyte, attacking the
          Water is a pipelined product that presents special challenges in   pipe coating, or harboring bacteria that add corrosion mecha-
          regard  to internal  corrosion prevention.  Most metallic  water   nisms. In the case of cast iron, a lower resistivity soil will pro-
          pipes have internal linings (cement mortar lining is common) to   mote graphitization of low ductility cast iron pipe as well as
          protect them from the corrosive nature of the transported water.   corrosion of carbon steel.
          Raw or partially treated water systems for delivery to agricul-   Points should be reduced where soil conditions are unknown,
          tural and/or landscaping applications are becoming more com-   known to be corrosion promoting, or where placement of non-
          mon.  Water  corrosivity  might  change  depending  on  the   native material has added an unknown factor.
          treatment process and the quality of the transported water.   Score this item as described.
            With the lower pressures normally seen in distribution sys-
           tems, infiltration can be a potential problem. Infiltration occurs   Coating
           when an outside material migrates into the pipeline. Most com-
           monly, water is the substance that enters the pipe. While more   In general,  the  coating  condition  variables  for  subsurface
           common in gravity-flow water and sewer lines, a high water   metallic pipes can be scored as detailed in Chapter 4. Some dif-
           table can cause enough pressure to force water into even pres-   ferent coating materials might be found in distribution systems
           surized pipelines  including  portions  of gas distribution  sys-   compared with transmission pipelines (such as loose polyethyl-
           tems.  Conduit pipe for  fiber optic  cable or  other  electronic   ene bags surrounding cast iron pipes), but these are still appro-
           transmission cables is also susceptible to infiltration and subse-   priately evaluated in terms of their suitability, application, and
           quent threats to system integrity.         the related maintenance practices.
            When foreign material enters the pipe, product contamina-
           tion and internal corrosion are possible.. Scoring the variables   Cathodic protection
           for internal corrosion, product corrosivity, and internal protec-
           tion can be done as described and in consideration of additional   Modem metallic distribution systems (steel and ductile iron,
           corrosion scenarios as discussed above.    mostly) are installed with coatings and/or cathodic protection
                                                      when soil conditions warrant. However, in many older metal
           Subsurface corrosion                       systems, little or no corrosion barriers were put into design con-
                                                      siderations. Note that the absence of an anticorrosion coating,
           In this section, the evaluator looks for evidence that corrosion   when one is warranted, scores no points-high   risk of corro-
           can or is occurring in pipe buried underground and that proper   sion--under  this evaluation system. Full points, however, can
           actions are being directed to prevent that corrosion. A distinc-   be awarded in both the cathodic protection  and condition of
           tion is made between metal and nonmetal buried pipe. For non-   coating variables when the criterion of “no corrosion possible”
           metal pipe, a subsequent section offers ideas on how to assess   is met, even if an engineered corrosion prevention system does
           corrosion potential. Another section shows one methodology   not exist. That is, if it can be demonstrated that corrosion will
           for combining subsurface corrosion assessments of metal and   not occur in a certain area, credit for a cathodic protection sys-
           nonmetal pipe.                             tem may be given. The evaluator should ensure that adequate
            Common industry practice is to employ a two-part defense   tests of all possible corrosion-enhancing conditions at all times
           against  galvanic  corrosion  of  a  steel  pipeline.  One  line  of   of the year have been made. In general, the cathodic protection
           defense is a coating over the pipeline-the  other line of defense   variables for subsurface metallic pipes can be scored as detailed
           is application of cathodic protection (CP). These are discussed   in Chapter 4 with special attention paid to the increased poten-
           in detail in Chapter 4 and can be generally assessed according   tial for interferences  in a more urban environment. This and
           to the protocols described there. Additional considerations for   some other considerations are discussed below.
           Chapter 4 variables are discussed below.    Distribution systems are often divided into sections to opti-
                                                      mize cathodic protection.  Older, poorly coated steel sections
           Subsurface environment                     will have quite different current requirements than will newer,
                                                      well-coated steel  lines. These  systems must  be well  isolated
           Because a coating system is always considered to be an imper-   (electrically) from each other to allow cathodic protection to be
           fect barrier, the soil is always assumed to be in contact with the   effective. Given the isolation of sections, the grid layout, and
           pipe wall at some points. Soil corrosivity is primarily a measure   the often smaller diameters of distribution piping, a system of
           of how well the soil can act as an electrolyte to promote gal-   distributed  anodes-strategically  placed  anodes-is   some-
           vanic corrosion  on the pipe. Additionally, aspects  of the soil   times more efficient than a rectifier impressed current system.
           that may  otherwise  directly or indirectly promote  corrosion
           mechanisms  should  be  considered.  These  include  bacterial   Cathodicprofection effectiveness  Test leads. Where cathodic
           activity and the presence of corrosive-enhancing chemicals in   protection is needed but is not being used, this item should nor-
           the soil.                                  mally score 0 points. While it can be argued that pipe-to-soil
            The  evaluator should be  alert  to  instances  where  the  soil   protection readings can be taken even in the absence of applied
           conditions  change  rapidly.  Certain  road  bed  materials,  past   cathodic  protection,  this  information  may  only  provide  an
           waste disposal sites, imported foreign materials, etc., can cause   incomplete picture of corrosion mechanisms.
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258