Page 192 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 192

Trawl Impact, Pullover and Hooking Loads                             165


         In this study a constant soil spring stiffness is assumed due to the very small time period of
         the impact response.

         11.4.5  Impact Response
         General
         In this section, detailed impact response analyses will be described.


        The purpose of  this section is to model  a trawl board  impact on  a pipeline resting on  the
         seabed. The main acceptance criteria on assessing pipe behavior under dynamic load are pipe
         shell dent, coating deflection and forces and stresses in pipe body. The objective is to identify
         the  minimum  for  coating characteristics to  provide  sufficient protection  of  the  pipelines
         against impact load of trawl board - pipeline interaction.

         Conclusions of the Analyses
        The acceptance criteria for trawl board impact response under accidental loads is no leak,
        STATOIL (1996). This implies that:

        -  no  direct contact between  trawl  board  and  steel  pipe  (no gouge  should occur due  to
           impact) - this means deformation of  coating should be sufficiently less than  the coating
           thickness.
        -   the dent depth of the steel pipe should be less than 5% of steel pipe diameter.
        -   the  local  equivalent stress  in  the  pipe  should  be  sufficiently small  to  avoid possible
           bursting - this failure mode is not considered to govern in the impact analysis.
        -   the maximum tensile strain should be sufficiently small to avoid possible fracture at girth
           weld - this failure mode is not considered to govern in the impact analysis.


        Detailed modeling of  local strain is also necessary in  case we  evaluate possible fracture at
        girth welds during impact process. However, bursting due to over-stress and fracture due to
        over-strain will be more critical during pullover process. These failure modes are therefore
        not considered in the present impact response analysis and will be evaluated in the pullover
        response analysis.

        Finite Element Model
        In the finite element calculations, it is assumed that:


        - coating density r,  =  1200 kg/m3
        - coating indentation curve is 6, = a  F2


        A 60 meters long pipe section is fixed at both ends. Pipe shell and coating are modeled by two
        nonlinear springs acting in direction of the impact and placed one after the other. The springs
        do not provide any reaction force on tensile deformation and the springs are unloaded along
        line parallel to slope at origin of loading curve (plastic behavior).
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197