Page 178 - Planning and Design of Airports
P. 178

Airport Planning Studies    145


                      3.  Displace a significant number of people
                      4.  Have a significant aesthetic or visual effect
                     5.  Divide or disrupt an established community or divide exist-
                        ing uses
                      6.  Have any effect on areas of unique interest or scenic beauty
                      7.  Destroy or derogate important recreational areas
                      8.  Substantially alter the pattern of behavior for a species
                     9.  Interfere with important wildlife breeding, nesting, or feed-
                        ing grounds
                     10.  Significantly increase air or water pollution
                     11.  Adversely affect the water table of an area
                     12.  Cause excessive congestion on existing ground transporta-
                        tion facilities
                     13.  Adversely affect the land-use plan for the region

                    The preparation of an environmental impact statement based
                 upon an environmental assessment study is an extremely important
                 part of the airport planning process. The statement should clearly
                 identify the problems that will affect environmental quality and the
                 proposed actions to alleviate them. Unless the statement is sufficiently
                 comprehensive, the entire airport development may be in jeopardy.


                 Economic and Financial Feasibility
                 The economic and financial feasibility of alternative plans for a new
                 airport or expansion of an existing site must be clearly demonstrated
                 by the planner. Even if the selected alternative is shown to be eco-
                 nomically feasible, then also it is necessary to show that the plan will
                 generate sufficient revenues to cover annual costs of capital invest-
                 ment, administration, operations, and maintenance. This must be
                 determined for each stage or phase of development detailed in the
                 airport master plan.
                    An evaluation of economic feasibility requires an analysis of ben-
                 efits and costs. A comparison of benefits and costs of potential capital
                 investment programs indicates the desirability of a project from an
                 economic point of view. The economic criterion used in evaluating an
                 aviation investment is the total cost of facilities, including quantifi-
                 able social costs, compared with the value of the increased effective-
                 ness measured in terms of total benefits. The costs include capital
                 investment, administration, operation, maintenance, and any other
                 costs that can be quantified. The benefits include a reduction in air-
                 craft and passenger delays, improved operating efficiency, and other
                 benefits. The costs and benefits are usually determined on an annual
                 basis.
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183