Page 241 - Plant design and economics for chemical engineers
P. 241

212  PLANT DESIGN AND ECONOMICS FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERS

      fL  = current labor cost index in new location relative to cost of EL and ML
      f,,,,  = current material cost index relative to cost of M
      f,  = cost factor for miscellaneous items
      fP  = cost factor for piping materials
      f, = total cost of field-fabricated vessels (less incremental cost of alloy)
      f, = specific material unit cost, e.g., fp = unit cost of pipe
      fy  = specific material labor unit cost per employee-hour
      H,  = engineering employee-hours
       I  = total indirect cost of plant
      M  = material cost
     M;  = labor employee-hours for specific material
     ML  = direct labor cost for equipment installation and material handling
     M,  = specific material quantity in compatible units
       p  = total pump plus driver cost (less incremental cost of alloy)
       R  = ratio of new to original capacity
       s. =  total income from sales
       ;  = total cost of tower shells (less incremental cost of alloy)
       T  = total capital investment
       V  = manufacturing fixed-capital investment
      W = working-capital investment
       x  = exponential power for cost-capacity relationships


    PROBLEMS
     1.  The purchased cost of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger (floating head and carbon-steel
       tubes) with 100 ft2  of heating surface was $3000 in 1980. What will be the purchased
       cost of a similar heat exchanger with 200 ft2 of heating surface in 1980 if the
       purchased-cost-capacity exponent is 0.60 for surface area ranging from 100 to 400
       ft2?  If the purchased-cost-capacity exponent for this type of exchanger is 0.81 for
       surface areas ranging from 400 to 2000 ft2,  what will be the purchased cost of a heat
       exchanger with 1000 ft2  of heating surface in 1985?
     2. Plot the 1985 purchased cost of the shell-and-tube heat exchanger outlined in the
       previous problem as a function of the surface area from 100 to 2000 ft2.  Note that
       the purchased-cost-capacity exponent is not constant over the range of surface area
       requested.
     3. The purchased and installation costs of some pieces of equipment are given as a
       function of weight rather than capacity. An example of this is the installed costs of
       large tanks. The 1980 cost for an installed aluminum tank weighing 100,000 lb was
       $390,000. For a size range from 200,000 to 1,000,000  lb, the installed cost-weight
       exponent for aluminum tanks is 0.93. If an aluminum tank weighing 700,000 lb is
       required, what is the present capital investment needed?
     4. What weight of installed stainless-steel tank could have been obtained for the same
       capital investment as in the previous problem? The 1980 cost for an installed 304
       stainless-steel tank weighing 300,000 lb was $670,000. The installed cost-weight
       exponent for stainless tanks is 0.88 for a size range from 300,000 to 700,000 lb.
     5. The purchased cost of a 1400-gal  stainless-steel tank in 1980 was $7500. The tank is
       cylindrical with flat top and bottom, and the diameter is 6 ft. If the entire outer
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246