Page 207 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes
P. 207

Chapter 11
            Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Hemp
            (Cannabis sativa L.) as Fibre Crops for
            Phytoextraction of Heavy Metals: Biological,

            Agro-technological and Economical
            Point of View



            Miroslav Griga and Marie Bjelkova ´


            11.1  Introduction


            The technology of heavy metals (HMs) phytoextraction from the polluted soils
            should include several components in order to be exploitable and cost efficient.
            First one is a biological component, which represents available plant species
            exhibiting high/good HMs accumulation and tolerance. Such candidate species
            should produce high above-ground biomass and the metal element of interest
            should be easily transported from roots to above-ground harvestable organs. From
            the genetic point of view, the culture crops have advantage (as compared to wild
            species) that they represent genetically homogenous and stable populations (clone,
            line and variety) with optimised growth and development parameters provided by
            breeding process. Second one is a technological component, which involves com-
            plex technology of growing, integrated plant protection and harvest (using efficient
            field machinery), and regulation of HMs bioavailability and uptake by proper
            agrotechnological treatments. The very important point is the possibility of further
            industrial processing of HMs-contaminated biomass. Finally, third one is an
            economical component which includes cost of phytoextraction, time of phyto-
            extraction (cleaning of particular site to desired/acceptable level of metal element),
            cost of handling with HMs-contaminated biomass, and reduction of overall costs of
            phytoremediation process by production of added value products from HMs-
            contaminated biomass. If one component of the scheme suffers from some
            shortcomings/limits, it should be compensated by advantages of other components.



            M. Griga (*)
            Plant Biotechnology Department, AGRITEC Plant Research Ltd., Zeme ˇde ˇlska ´ 16, 787 01
            ˇ
            Sumperk, Czech Republic
            e-mail: griga@agritec.cz
            M. Bjelkova ´
                                                                        ˇ
            Department of Industrial Crops, AGRITEC Plant Research Ltd., Zeme ˇde ˇlska ´ 16, 787 01 Sumperk,
            Czech Republic

            D.K. Gupta (ed.), Plant-Based Remediation Processes, Soil Biology 35,  199
            DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-35564-6_11, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212