Page 220 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes

Reference Citterio et al. (2003) Kos et al. (2003) Kos a Lestan ˇ (2004) Piotrowska-Cyplik and Czarnecki (2003a, b, 2005) Antonkiewicz et al. (2004)

4.90–38.09

Ni
0.32–2.56 0.2–0.75 0.21–1.10 2.69–32.13
Ni Zn 8.42–36.74 1.08–9.40 6.35–16.32 Cu Zn 19.00–267.33
44.29–330.28
90.36–105.07
HMs concentration in plant/plant organs (mg kg 1 DW) Ni Cd 2.7–31.4 0.3–58.8 14.0–52.1 0.4–73.0 3.4–321.8 0.6–1,368.2 Only above-ground tissue collected Pb Cd 10–220.58 0.17–0.76 Only above-ground tissue collected Pb Cd 0.53–1,026.49 0.35–3.84 Cu 1.23–4.63 0.74–1.61 0.93–6.82 Plant organs not distinguished P
2.3–6.9
1.2–1.8
n.d.
Zn
Zn
Cr

HMs concentration in soil/solution (mg kg 1 ) Cu: 208/25 Hg: <2/<2 Cd: 26.6–82 Ni: 49.6–114.6 Leaf: Cr: 117.7–138.8 Stem: (pot experiment; Root: semi-natural conditions) Pb: 1,100 Zn: 800 Cd: 5.5 (pot experiment; semi-natural conditions, soil from industrial site) Pb: 1,750 Zn: 1,300 Cd: 7.2 (pot experiment;

(continued) Aim of study phytoremediation aspect Hemp tolerance and ability to accumulate Cd, Ni and Cr Phytoextraction of Pb, Zn and Cd from soil increased by using chelators Soil washing of Pb, Zn, and Cd and induced phytoextraction using chelators Phytoextraction of heavy metals by hemp during anaerobic sewage s

11.4
Table Hemp variety Fibranova Not presented Not presented Benico Not presented