Page 236 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes
P. 236

228                                             M. Griga and M. Bjelkova ´

                                                         1
            Table 11.6 Examples of HMs absorbtion from square unit (g ha ) by fibre crops above-ground
            biomass a
            Plant species  HM phytoextraction               Reference
            Cotton       Cu: 28; Fe: 626; Mn: 388; Zn: 103  Mullins and Burmester
              (Gossypium                                       (1993)
              hirsutum)
            Fibre flax (Linum Pb: 39; Cu: 54                 Grzebisz et al. (1997a, b)
              usitatissimum) Cd: 49; Pb: 1,990; Zn: 700     Kos et al. (2003)
            Sida (Sida   Cu: 30.6; Cd: 25.8; Pb: 27.1; Ni: 32.2; Zn: 387.2; Borkowska et al. (2001)
              hermafrodita)  Co: 10.8; Mn: 156.9; Fe: 430.8; Cr: 6.2
            Hemp (Cannabis  Pb: 141; Cu: 377                Grzebisz et al. (1997a, b)
              sativa)    Cd: 44; Pb: 9,570; Zn: 3,680       Kos et al. (2003)
                         Cd: 126–830                        Linger et al. (2002, 2005)
            a
            No calculation of time needed for total/partial soil decontamination was reported in above
            mentioned papers (speculative estimation ¼ hundreds to tens of years)

            11.6  Management and Industrial Processing of Contaminated
                  Biomass


            One of the crucial components of phytoextraction technology is the management
            and potential industrial processing of HMs-contaminated biomass. As compared to
            other agricultural crops producing sufficiently great biomass and accumulating
            heavy metals, flax and hemp has indisputable advantage in the extensive (multipur-
            pose) and complete industrial utilisation of harvested biomass (Brouwer 2000;
            Karus and Vogt 2004). The use of flax and hemp in textile industry (natural fibres;
            supplement to synthetic fibres—linen fabrics, geotextile, agrotextile, insulation and
            filtration), pulp-and-paper industry, building and furniture industry (reinforced par-
            ticle boards; reinforced building materials—paintings, concrete; composite
            polymers; insulation materials), chemical industry (oils, paints and varnishes), car
            and airplane industry (inside-door panellings) as well as energy crop (bales of straw,
            combustible briquettes, biopetroleum) was in last decade many times documented
                                                          ˇ
            (Domier 1996; Murphy et al. 1997; Baraniecki et al. 1995;Staud and Bjelkova ´ 1997;
            Brouwer 2000; Karus and Vogt 2004). After decades of high-tech developments of
            artificial fibres like carbon, aramid and glass it is remarkable that natural grown
            fibres have gained a renewed interest, especially as a glass fibre substitute in
            automotive industries. Fibres like flax, hemp or jute are cheap, have better stiffness
            per unit weight and have a lower impact on the environment (Brouwer 2000). Only
            increased content of heavy metals in fibre processed for clothing would represent
                                                                       ¨
            some healthy risk and should be carefully monitored (Lukipudis, 2001;Oko Tex
            Standard 2005; Szynkowska et al. 2009; Table 11.7). Other industrial products
            practically do not represent any healthy risk. Also linseed oil is during seed
            processing (pressing) get off the heavy metals (Wislicki et al. 1997; Hocking and
            McLaughlin 2000). Thus, heavy metal contaminated flax and hemp raw material
            may be processed for many kinds of industrial products with added value which fact
            significantly decreases the cost of potential phytoremediation.
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241