Page 82 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes
P. 82

70                                                    O.P. Abioye et al.

            non-protein thiol (NP-SH), cysteine, glutathione, ascorbic acid, proline, and anti-
            oxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase
            (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase
            (GR). However, the response varies with plant species, metal concentration, and
            exposure conditions.


            4.5.1.1  Chelates Assisted Mechanism in Phytoextraction of Lead

            One major factor limiting the potential for lead phytoextraction is low metal
            bioavailability for plant uptake (Raskin and Ensley 2000). To overcome this
            limitation, synthetic chemical chelators may need to be added to the contaminated
            soil to increase the amount of lead that is bioavailable for the plants. The use of
            synthetic chelates in the phytoremediation process is not only to increase heavy
            metal uptake by plants through increasing the bioavailability of the metal, but also
            to increase micronutrient availability, which decreases the possibility of plant
            nutrient deficiencies (Blaylock and Huang 1999). The goal of commercial
            phytoextraction is to remove or reduce the level of toxic metals within the
            contaminated soils to meet regulatory standards within 1–3 years (Raskin and
            Ensley 2000). The regulatory standard for lead-contaminated soil set by the EPA
            is 500 ppm. Plants that accumulate more than 1 % of the target contaminant in the
            harvestable portion and produce more than 20 metric tons of shoot biomass per
            hectare per year are required to achieve this goal (Raskin and Ensley 2000).
            Researchers have found that through the application of soil amendments and
            chemical chelates this goal can be achieved. Based on scientific studies, it has
            been shown that only 0.1 % of the total amount of lead in contaminated soils is in
            solution and bioavailable to plants for remediation. With the addition of synthetic
            chelators, the total amount of lead in solution can be increased up to 100 times
            (Raskin and Ensley 2000). Increasing the mobility and bioavailability of lead in the
            soil through certain chelators, organic acids, or chemical compounds allows for the
            hyperaccumulation of metals in some plants. For lead, a number of different
            chelators have been tested: EDTA (ethylene-dinitrilo-tetra acetic acid), CDTA
            (trans-1,2-cyclohexylene-dinitrilo-tetra acetic acid), DTPA (diethylenetrinitrilo-
            penta acetic acid), EGTA (ethylebis[oxyethylenetrinitrilo]-tetra acetic acid),
            HEDTA (hydroxyethyl-ethylene-dinitrilo-tri acetic acid), citric acid, and malic
            acid. Addition of the chelates resulted in enhanced shoot lead concentrations.
            EDTA proved to be the best and least expensive, costing around $1.95 per pound.
            In soils with a pH of 5 and amended with EDTA, plants accumulated nearly
                       1
            2,000 mg kg  more lead in their shoots when compared to other treatments in
            soil limed to a pH of 7.5. EDTA, DTPA, and CDTA all achieved shoot lead
                                               1
            concentrations of more than 10,000 mg kg .
                                                               1
              In order for substantial lead accumulation (>5,000 mg kg ) to occur in the
            shoots, the concentration of synthetic chelates (EDTA, DTPA, and CDTA) must
                           1
            exceed 1 mol kg . It was also noted that plants grown in soils amended with
            chelators varied in their lead concentration uptake. For example, the lead
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87