Page 159 - Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications
P. 159

134                Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications

         Pb(Mg 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 –PbTiO 3 (PMN-PT) [51], or Pb(Zr x Ti 1 x )O 3 [52] into the polymer
         matrix. In these ceramic polymer composites, a very large concentration of ceramic
         particles (e.g., >50 vol%) is needed, resulting in a significant improvement in
         Young’s modulus of the polymer composites. Other structural imperfections like
         pores and voids are also introduced, which causes a decreased breakdown strength
         of the polymer composites. Polymer composites show dielectric breakdown at electric
         fields even lower than the breakdown strength of the ferroelectric ceramic fillers, even
         when polymer matrix of high breakdown strength is used. Polymer composites can
         achieve polarization at very low electric fields where saturated polarization of the
         ferroelectric ceramic fillers may yet be achieved. Thus, the ferroelectric properties
         of polymer composites are limited by the large volume fraction of ceramic fillers
         and the subsequent microstructural imperfections. To overcome the issue of the high
         volume fraction of ceramic particles in the polymer composites, one effective remedy
         lies in the employment of ceramic fillers with a large aspect ratio rather than the com-
         monly used spherical particles. The advantages of using large-aspect-ratio fillers are
         twofold: (i) They can enhance the dielectric constant of the composites at much lower
         volume fractions due to their large dipole moments [53], and (ii) they possess reduced
         surface energy and hence prevent agglomeration [54]. The microstructural imperfec-
         tions can be reduced by better compatibility between the ceramic and polymer matrix,
         which is usually obtained by surface modification of the ceramic particles [40,55,56].
         Surface engineering causes stronger interfaces between the ceramic fillers and the
         polymer matrices by producing interfacial bonds through active surface groups
         added by surface treatments. Recently, a common biomaterial, dopamine, has been
         considered as a robust and generic surface building block due to its efficient interfa-
         cial adhesion strength to a variety of surfaces including polymers and metal
         oxides [57,58].
            To further overcome the limitations of the inorganic-polymer composites in a con-
         trollable way, numerous efforts were made with chemical modification being in focus,
         namely, (i) use of some specific molecules for surface modification, such as silanes
         [59], phosphonic acid [55], and ethylene diamine [45]; (ii) encapsulation by smaller
         metal oxide [49,60]; and (iii) in situ polymerization on the surfaces of the
         nanoparticles [56,61-65]. Silane coupling agent was extensively used to modify nano-
         particle surfaces to improve the dispersion of the fillers in polymer matrix. However,
         the unabsorbed residual components would result in high leakage current and dielec-
         tric loss [59,66].
            To overcome the limitations of either polymers or ceramics, organic polymers
         along with inorganic ceramics have been developed recently [32,67-73].Perry
         et al. fabricated barium titanate (BT)-based polymer nanocomposites with a good
         energy storage density by modifying the BT nanoparticles with coupling agents
         [40,55]. Marks and coworkers synthesized a series of polypropylene (PP)
         nanocomposites by in situ olefin polymerization. Efficient nanoparticle dispersion,
         large dielectric constant, low dielectric loss, large breakdown strength, and
         improved energy storage density were obtained in these PP nanocomposites
         [53,60,62,74,75].
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164