Page 294 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 294

Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures                 269
       You-Sheng Wu, Wei-Cheng Cui and Guo-Jun Zhou (Eds)
       0 2001 Elsevicr Science Ltd.  All rights reserved


               INTEGRATION OF FIRST-PRINCIPLE APPROACHES
                   TO DESIGN FOR DAMAGE SURVIVABILITY


                                 D. Konovessis' and D. Vassalos'

               ' The Ship Stability Research Centre, Department of Ship and Marine Technology,
                           University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 IXN, UK



       ABSTRACT

       The paper elaborates on the development of a procedure for accommodating damage survivability in
       the  ship  design  process  cost-effectively.  For  passenger  Ro-Ro  vessels,  damage  survivability
       considerations make sense only when adequate subdivision criteria have been satisfied whilst allowing
       for other design considerations.  The paper  highlights and demonstrates that a ship design process
       could not possibly be optimal without involving the designer and hence any attempt to develop a fully
       automated procedure will be futile.  The paper focuses on the development of the objective function,
       on  thc  design  parameters  and  on  the  integration  of  first-principles approaches,  notably  suitable
       Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) frameworks, to be included within the design for survivability
       optimisation process.


       KEYWORDS
       Design, Optimisation, First-Principles, Survivability, Quantitative Risk Assessment


       1  INTRODUCTION

       The approaches that can be deployed to allow for integration of safety considerations in the ship design
       process vary according to the stage the process has reached  and the specific criteria compliance is
       sought for.  A holistic approach should integrate the various methods available, taking into account the
       fact that the design information available at the initial phases of the design process is by  no means
       complete or accurate and that as the process develops the quantity and quality of information increases,
       thus  allowing  for  design  assessment  and  analysis  using  advanced  tools  and  techniques,  until
       convergence is reached.

       It should be highlighted, that the latter only reflects a physical demand, Le. assessment at any stage of
       a process can only be based on the information available. The sequential nature of the well-known and
       established ship design spiral is no longer an issue to adhere to, given the technological advances of
       the last decade, particularly in computer science, for example work on distributed computer systems.
       However, in the every-day ship design practice, this sequential approach has been replaced by  groups
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299