Page 141 - Practical Ship Design
P. 141

108                                                             Chupter 4

              4.5.2  Two or three group methods

              A slightly more sophisticated treatment would divide the machinery weight into
              two components: propulsion machinery and remainder. In the  1976 paper where
              this two-group method was suggested, the propulsion machinery was limited to the
              dry weight of the main engine which can be obtained from manufacturers’ cata-
              logues with everything else being taken with the remainder.
                Largely because of the availability of data in this format, this demarcation  is
              followed again in this book, although the author can now see advantages  in the
              alternative three-group demarcation. In this demarcation the propulsion group is
              enlarged to include main engine lubricating oil and cooling water, any gearing, the
              shafting, bearings  and  glands and  propeller(s)  as well  as the  dry  main  engine
              weight.  The  second  group  would  then  consist  of  generators,  boilers  and  heat
              exchangers, all pumps, valves and piping, compressors and other auxiliaries. The
              third group would consist of items such as ladders, gratings, uptakes and vents, the
              funnel, sundry tanks, etc. As these items are generally a good deal cheaper per tonne
              than  machinery items, keeping these separate helps cost estimating. As the total
              weight of these items will generally be more dependent on the propulsion machinery
              type and power and the general size of the engine room than on the auxiliaries
              fitted segregating them into a separate group helps to improve weight estimation.
                The original two-group treatment has the advantage that the weight of the main
              engine can usually be obtained from a catalogue and this significant portion of the
              weight can therefore be presumed to be correct limiting any error in the machinery
              weight estimation to that occurring in the estimation of the remainder, the treat-
              ment of which as a single entity has the merit of simplicity.
                The  two-component  demarcation  is,  however,  unsuitable  for  recording  the
              weights of diesel-electric  machinery installations in which an aggregate of gener-
              ators provides  both  the  propulsion  power  and  the  electricity  supply  for other
              purposes. Weights for diesel-electric  machinery seem best kept as a single unit and
              plotted against the total power which can be generated with all engines on full load.

              4.5.4 Propulsion machinery weight

              If catalogues giving dry machinery weights are not readily available approximate
              values for slow and medium speed diesels can be obtained from Fig. 4.15 which is
              a modified version of a plot from the 1976 paper. The base parameter used in this
              plot is the maximum torque rating of the engines as represented by MCWRPM and
              in 1976 it was commented that most of the current engines conformed remarkably
              closely to a mean line represented by the formula:


                                                                                (4.9)
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146