Page 195 - Practical Ship Design
P. 195

Powrt-ing I                                                          161


           After  discussion,  tank  superintendents  agreed  that  skin  friction  was  being
         over-estimated by the Froude method, and decided to change to the  1957 ITTC
         formulation. More recently, appreciation of the effect of the form has changed the
         emphasis with  the  frictional element now  being  seen  once  again  as much  the
         largest part of  the resistance of most ships.

         6.2.6 Hull finish, AC and (I + x)
         The ITTC 57 model-ship  correlation line was intended to eliminate ship-model
         correlation making (1 + x) = 1 .OO for all-welded ships having a shell roughness
         amplitude of 165 microns which was found to be typical of new construction in the
         decade 1960- 1 970.
           Prior  to the general use of  AC, various formulae had been  suggested for the
         calculation of (1 + x) for different shell roughness values, with the most authori-
         tative  probably  being  that  given  in  a  1980 R.1.N.A paper  “Speed, power  and
         roughness  - the  economics of  outer bottom  maintenance” by  Townsin et  al.,
         although the physics of this have been challenged.
           In this paper the value of x is shown to change with a change in roughness (h) in
         microns mean apparent amplitude (MAA) as follows:

           A(x) = 0.058 [(h,)”’ - (h2)i’3]                                (6.1 1)

         Applied to a base of (1 + x) = 1 .OO at h,  = 165, this gives the following values.
           MAA        (1 +x)
            80        0.932
            125       0.968
            165       1 .ooo
           230        1.037
           400        1.109
         125 microns is quoted in a 1972 NMI Report No. 172 as the best figure achieved on
         the  ships  measured  in  that  survey;  230  is  quoted  as  typical  of  a  rather  poor
         performance, and 400 was the worst.
           As has already been said, modern practice favours the use of AC rather than
         ( I  + x). A formula for AC suggested by Townsin and accepted by ITTC,  although
         here once again the physics of this empirical formula have been challenged,  is
           IO3 AC =44[(h/LWL)“3  -10(R,)-”3]+0.125                        (6.12)


         where h is an average measure of the height of the elements of roughness of the
         entire hull, LWL is the waterline length, both in identical units.
           It has been pointed out that AC can vary quite considerably even on hulls with
         the same h, depending on the number and spacing, individual height and shape of
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200