Page 207 - Practical Ship Design
P. 207

Powering  I                                                         I73


        Taylor’s units are: V in knots, L in feet, and A in tons of 2240 Ibs. R, and R, in lbs.
        The R, /A values for the actual BIT are then obtained by interpolation.
          The skin friction R, is calculated on the basis of
          RflA = f  S  V‘.83                                             (6.35)

          Taylor used a value off= 0.00904 as derived by Tideman as applicable to a 500
        ft ship of  steel construction (riveted  construction, clean  and  well  painted)  and
        suggested taking a value of S from the following formula:
          s = CJAL

        The coefficient C has an average value of  15.4 in its original units of tons, feet and
        feet squared which becomes 2.6 for units of tonnes, metres and metres squared.
          Taylor’s wetted surface formula remains a widely used one and a modified SI
        unit graph of the coefficient plotted against midship section coefficient and BIT is
        reproduced as Fig. 6. I.
          In their day, Taylor’s methods gave quite an accurate estimate of the resistance,
        although  some variables  that  are  now  thought  to have  a  significant  effect  are
        missing. For example, no account is taken of the position of the longitudinal centre
        of  buoyancy  and  no  distinction  is  made between  single-screw  and  twin-screw
        forms, both of which are generally recognised as influencing the resistance. By the
        same  token,  the  power  estimate  gives  little  help  towards  designing  lines  to
        minimise the power required.
          A much improved presentation of the Taylor tests is given in “A Reanalysis of
        the Original Test Data for the Taylor Standard Series” by M. Gertler published in
        DTMB Report 806 of  1954.
          Several tanks to this day present the ratio model resultRaylor prediction as an
        indicator of quality.



                                6.6 AYRE’S C2 METHOD

        This was presented by Sir Amos Ayre first in 1927 and revised in 1933 and 1948 in
        papers to the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders.
          Ayre’s formula is

                                                                         (6.36)


          This  is  very  similar  to  the  Admiralty  coefficient  formula,  except  that  the
        formula is for EHP and not SHP, and the index of the displacement is 0.64 and not
        213. Contours of C2 are plotted on a base of VI&  for a range of LlA”3 from 10 to 30.
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212