Page 209 - Practical Ship Design
P. 209

Powering I                                                           I75


           This can be transformed into
           C,=  C‘,X[(B,/B,)~~~X(T,/T~) 35)
                                        (I
                                          47Fn-0
                                                                         (6.38)
           Moor gives limits for the use of these indices of a 10% change in the Beam ratio
        and a 15% change in the Draft ratio, whilst the F, range is stated as from 0.15 to
        0.27. The author, in his design work, has gaily extrapolated well beyond all three
        limits without his calculations being found in error to any degree by  later tank
        testing. But caution is of course desirable.
           It can be helpful when using Mumford indices to remember that G) increases
        with an increase in the beam ratio, but generally reduces with an increase in the
        draft ratio except at high speeds.
           Moor’s C: values are based on model results with turbulence stimulation but the
        Froude friction line was used and the appropriate ship/model correlation factors
        must therefore also be used.
          The standard ship method was also adopted by B.S.R.A. (British Ship Research
        Association)  for their very considerable programme of  tank test research which
        covered block coefficients from 0.525 to 0.875.
           Moor revised his “average” attainment data in a  1969 B.S.R.A. report, which
        also gives “optimum” values. This time the draft used was 24 ft (7.32 m) and the
        range of block coefficient was increased to cover from 0.54 to 0.88 and the VI&
        values to cover from 0.40 to 1.10. Although the effect of the draft change is not
        very great, this change needs to be carefully noted if great accuracy is required.
           Possibly because of the increasing number of ships with bulbous bows by this
        time, Moor felt that the standards were better established without reference to the
        LCB position, although a plot of the LCB positions of the best forms used to derive
        the optimum curves is given.

        6.7.2 Twin-screw ships
        In  another R.I.N.A. paper “Some aspects of  passenger  liner design” written  in
        1962 in conjunction with R.V. Turner and M. Harper, Moor presented  what  is
        probably the best of the rather limited data there is available on the resistance and
        propulsion of twin-screw ships. The data in the paper referred to “average modern
        attainment”, but was revised and extended to give “optimum” data as a B.S.R.A.
        report in 1968.
           For twin-screw ships the standard ship has the same length and beam, but the
        draft is reduced to 18 ft (5.5 m)
           Corrections for beam and draft variations from the standard figures are again
        made using Mumford indices. These are given for a wider range of beam and draft
        ratios than for single-screw ships and cover a greater range of V/&  and in this case
        the index x varies with F,.
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214