Page 260 - Practical Ship Design
P. 260

218                                                             Chapter 7

             7.5.1 Slow revving propellers

             Whilst it is possible to design, and optimise the open water efficiency of, a propeller
             for any required power output, propeller diameter and revdmin, there is no doubt
             that the starting point of a search for efficiency should be the use of the largest
             propeller diameter that the ship can be designed to accommodate without un-
             acceptable adverse consequences in association with the lowest revs/min that suits
             this propeller and can be obtained from suitable propulsion machinery.
               An indication of the gains to be obtained by using low revslmin is provided by
             Emerson’s approximate formula for QPC  which  with  a  slight increase in  the
             constant to bring it into line with modern propeller design, is:

                qd = 0.84 --  N&                                              (7.21)
                          10,000

             where
               N = revlmin
               L = length BP in metres

             A plot of this formula is given in Fig. 7.13. In this figure Emerson’s formula has
             been extended to values of N smaller, and values of L larger than the data from
             which  it  was  originally derived. Remarkably, in  spite of  this  extrapolation it
             continues, in the author’s experience, to give reasonably accurate answers, although
             caution must be advised in its use at low Nand large L values.
                Figure 7.15 shows the improvement in propeller efficiency that is obtained by
             today’s slower revving engines. On a 300 m ship the gain from a change from 1 10



                        0.80


                        0.75

                     Q.  .P  .c.
                        0.70



                        0.65
                            50      60      70     80      90     100     110
                                                  R.P.M.

                                 Fig. 7.13. QPC versus rprn and ship length.
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265