Page 265 - Practical Ship Design
P. 265

Powering I1                                                         223

           There are a number of formulae for f, w, and qr, most, if not all, of which were
         derived by regression analysis. An examination of these shows:
            (i)  That thrust deduction f is reduced if the water flow to the propeller is good
                and the  clearances from the hull are relatively  large; aspects  of  design
                which should in any case be observed to avoid the possibility of propeller
                induced vibration. Favourable factors are:
                  relatively small propeller diameter
                  relatively large LIB ratio
                  relatively fine Cb
                  Lcb relatively far forward
                In practice a designer is unlikely to be influenced by these considerations.
           (ii)  That wake  fraction w, depends primarily  on the block  coefficient with
                which it increases linearly, indicating that water is entrained to a greater
                extent by a full ship than by a fine one, and on the ship’s length and the BIT
                ratio.
           (iii)  That  relative  rotative  efficiency  qr increases  primarily  with  increasing
                propeller diameter relative to ship length and to a lesser extent with increase
                in block coefficient.

         Although all these formulae may enable a reasonably accurate prediction of hull
         efficiency to be made, they give disappointingly little guidance on how to improve
         hull efficiency. There does not for example appear to be any size effect such as is
         given by the & in Emerson’s QPC equation. This is made even more surprising
         when the same reference then goes on to give a formula for QPC which has the N
         & term plus a number of other refinements.



                         7.7 TRIAL AND SERVICE ALLOWANCES


         7.7. I  Trial power
         It is important to remember that power estimates cannot be relied on to be 100%
         accurate. Grigson’s statement that the errors in the ITTC friction line can cause an
         underestimation of power by as much as 7% certainly suggests caution. There is
         also the question of shell finish and what standard can be relied on.
           The margin of power (over the best estimate) which it is wise to provide should
         depend partly on whether the ship is reasonably similar to ships which the shipyard
         has already built and partly on the penalty invoked for non-compliance with the
         trial speed. The author generally allowed 5%  initially in the power given to the
         marine engineers but was not sorry when a bigger margin arose, as it generally did,
         when the main machinery was selected.
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270