Page 296 - Practical Ship Design
P. 296

254                                                             Chapter 8


             of  the  ship the pitching  period  will be longer and the accelerations  less. Other
             design constraints generally prevent any significant action to follow this counsel
             but it should be kept in mind.
                The heavily flared sections forward advocated to minimise water on deck can
             increase pitching  (and forward damage) so a compromise between pitching and
             water on deck may be necessary.
                A bulbous bow may help to reduce pitching but is more likely than a normal
             bow to cause slamming.


             8.7.4 Rolling motions
             Rolling motions are largely a function of the metacentric height. A ship with a high
             GM (say 2.0 m or more) will have a short period of roll with uncomfortably high
             accelerations; a  ship  with  a  low  GM  (say  0.2  m  or  less) will  be  much  more
             comfortable with low accelerations but the amplitude of roll may be large.
                Stabilisers, either of fin or tank type provide the best way of reducing rolling.
             The fin type gives the best reduction in roll amplitude when the ship is operating at
             speed but if the ship may have to operate at a slow speed, tank stabilisers provide
             the best answer.
                Whether the  ship has  stabilisers  or not, bilge  keels  should be fitted  if  at all
             possible and should be carefully sized to their task. On full bodied ships the bilge
             keels should extend over most of the length of parallel middle body; on ships with
             no parallel middle body, or where the extent of parallel middle body is limited, the
             bilge keels must necessarily extend into the entrance and run but should be limited
             in  length  and  great  care  should  be  taken  to  ensure  that  the  keels  runs  along
              streamlines.  If  streamline  tests  are  not  available  Isherwood’s  R.I.N.A. paper
             provides a good guide to the line to follow.
                On fine lined ships where the length of bilge keels are limited this should be
             compensated by the use of deeper bilge keels to maintain the area. The depth of the
              keel should be limited so that it does not extend beyond the square of the hull and
              the keel should be arranged normal to the shell.
                An approximate formula for the length of bilge keel that it is usually practical to
              fit is:
                length of keel = 0.6 x C,, x L                                  (8.9)

                A formula for the depth of bilge keel which offsets the reduced length where the
              C,, is small which the author used for ships of up to about 180 m is:
                depth of keel = 0.18/(Cb - 0.2)                                (8.10)

              For today’s bigger ships this formula should probably be modified to include some
              small scaling with ship’s length.
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301