Page 367 - Practical Ship Design
P. 367

324                                                            Chapter 11


              compartments, each of which lie inside both A.T. and F.T. - all as shown in Fig.
              11.3. A  further  spreadsheet can then  be  used  for the  calculation  of  groups of
              compartments, also as shown in Fig. 11.3. Shown at the foot of Fig.  11.4, but not
              used in this case, are lines for the tabulation of si values leading on to the pi . si
              values and their aggregation to give the attained subdivision index A.
                In  the  simplistic  ship  shown  in  Fig.  11.4 there  were  neither  longitudinal
              bulkheads  nor  watertight  decks  introducing  complications in  the  subdivision.
              These are probably undesirable features from a subdivision and damaged stability
              point of view, but other reasons may nevertheless make them essential. Figure 11.6
              shows all the possible structural variants that can arise out of combinations of these
              features and the different damage possibilities.
                Longitudinal subdivision is dealt with by the use of a reduction factor r applied
              to the pi value of the compartment concerned. Values of r are given in Fig. 1 1.7.
                Horizontal subdivision is on the other hand treated as a factor affecting s - the
              probability of survival, already mentioned but not yet defined.
                The formula for s,  together with graphs of  its two components SIC and c are
              given as Fig. 11.8. Both require an input from damaged stability calculations for
              the compartment concerned; the former the GZ and the range and the latter the
              final angle of heel.
                It is a requirement that calculations of s are made at both the deepest subdivision
              loadline and at a partial loadline set at 60% of the difference between the light draft
              and the subdivision draft, with the results averaged.
                The permeabilities to be used in the damaged stability calculations are:
                stores     0.60  accommodation  0.95
                machinery  0.85  void spaces  0.95
                dry cargo  0.70  liquid tanks  0 or 0.95, whichever results in the more
                                                       severe requirement.
              Horizontal  subdivision  within  the  compartment brings  in  a  reduction  factor v
              which represents the probability that spaces above the division will not be flooded.
              A graph of  vi is given as the third  graph in Fig.  11.8 and should be  studied in
              association with the sections on Fig. 1 1.6.
                As was said earlier, the rules are very complicated  and demand the use of  a
              computer program.
                It has been said that very few existing ships would meet these rules, so some
              guidance for new designs is clearly desirable. Unfortunately practical designers
              have so far had little experience of the implications of the rules to guide them and
              until this is forthcoming must go cautiously and carry out full calculations before a
              design becomes fixed.
                Some good immediate guidance could be obtained by carrying out calculations
              for one or two existing ships and seeing by how much these fail and how they
              might best be modified to pass.
   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372