Page 168 - Principles and Applications of NanoMEMS Physics
P. 168

156                                                     Chapter 4


                                                             / 1  2
                    τ  Q  ª   cos θ             sin θ      º
                                                   2
                                  2
               ϕ  =  0  «                 +                »   ,                       (2)
                     κ  « ( 1+ V AC _ 2ω  V  ) ′  ( 1−V AC  _ 2ω  V ′ ) »
                 0                      2                 2
                        ¬
                                                           ¼
             where V ′ is a structure-dependent parameter, showing that the gain increases
             with the pump signal amplitude. The device has the potential to exploit the
             Casimir effect.

             4.2.2.2.4  Casimir Effect Oscillator

                This device, which was proposed and analyzed by Serry, Walliser, and
             Maclay  [180]  in 1995,  Figure 4-6, and experimentally realized  by Chan,
             Aksyuk, Kleiman, Bishop  and  Capasso [181] in 2001,  represents the  first
             clear demonstration of the impact of the Casimir force in the performance of
             NEMX.

                                 π π π 3 3 3  c =c =c =  R R R
                   F F F Spring  = = =  kz kz kz  F F F  = = =  0. 0.2 2
                    Spring
                    Spring
                             Casimir
                             Casimir
                             Casimir
                                 120 z z z
                                 120
                                 120  4 4 4
                                                   0.
                                                   0.1 1
                                              V V V  ( ( (  ) z) z) z
                                                   0 0
                                                        Spring
                                                        Spring
                                                        Spring
                                                   0.1
                                                   0.1
                                                        Spring+Casim
                                                        Spring+Casim
                                                        Spring+Casimir ir ir
                                                   0.2
                                                   0.2  1 1  0.5  0 0  0.5  1 1
                                                                 0.5
                                z z z
                                    z z z
                                                        0.5
                         0 z’ z’ z’  max
                         0 0
                                 max
                                 max
                                                             z z z
                                                             z z z max
                                                             max
                                                             max
                               2 2 2
                              ·
                        1 1
                         ¨ ¨ ¨
              V V V  Spring  (z)(z)(z ) = = =  1 § z ·§ z ·§ z  ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸  V V V  (z)(z)(z ) = = =  C C C
                         ¨ ¨ ¨
               Spring
               Spring
                                    Casim
                                    Casimir ir ir
                        2 z z z max ¹ ¹ ¹  Casim  § § §  z z z  · · ·  3 3 3
                        2 2
                         © © ©
                            max
                            max
                                              1 ¨1 ¨
                                             ¨ ¨ ¨ 1 ¨ − − −  ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸
                                             © © ©  z z z max ¹ ¹ ¹
                                                  max
                                                  max
                  Figure 4-6. Summary of nonlinear Casimir effect MEM resonator physics [22].
             The experiment entailed changing the  proximity  of  a  vibrating  rotational
             resonator to a metallic sphere, Figure 4-7(a), to measure its behavior in the
             absence/presence of the Casimir force. After determining the drive for linear
             response, the proximity of the oscillator to a metallic sphere was varied and
             the resonance frequency measured exhibited a behavior as depicted in Figure
             4-7(b). For  sphere-oscillator distances greater than  .3  3 µ m , the oscillator
             resonance frequency  was  equal to  the  drive frequency, 2748Hz, and  the
             angular amplitude frequency response was symmetric and centered around
             the drive frequency,  ω  =  k  I , where k is the spring constant and I the
                                 0
             moment of inertia, consistent with mass-spring force oscillator behavior.
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173