Page 125 - Principles of Applied Reservoir Simulation 2E
P. 125

110  Principles of Applied  Reservoir Simulation


        times the period  of the wave. The frequency of the wave is a measure of the
        energy of the wave and is conserved  as the wave propagates from one medium
        to another. The wavelength, however, can vary from one medium to another.
              When waves overlap -  or superpose -  they create a wavelet, as shown
        in Figure  12-4. The time duration associated with the wavelet  disturbance is
        denoted Af. The wavelet has a velocity Fin a medium, and the period  Tis the
        width of the wavelet when plotted as a trace on a time-map of seismic data. The
        length  of the wave is equal to the velocity  V times the period  T. Thus, if the
        wavelet has a  10 millisecond period and the velocity is 5000 feet per second in
        a particular medium, then the length L of that wavelet is 50 feet.



                          Wavelet

                                       V= velocity in medium
                                       T = A / = period  of  wavelet



                    Figure  12-4. Seismic wavelet.

             If seismic data has enough resolving power to show the reflecting bound-
        aries of a geologic layer, then the amplitudes of the seismic waves may be useful
        for further characterizing petrophysical properties of the reservoir. For example,
        suppose a reservoir region is characterized by a porosity  <f>, permeability K, net
        thickness h net, and oil saturation S 0. Seismic amplitude may be correlatable with
        rock  quality  (for  example,  Kh net  or  §kh net)  or  oil  productive  capacity  (for
                  <j> kh net). When a correlation does exist between seismic amplitude
        example, S 0
        and a grouping of petrophysical parameters, the correlation may be used to help
        guide the distribution of reservoir properties in areas between wells.
             Figures  12-5a and b show two approaches to contouring a set of values
        at control points. The smooth contour lines shown in Figure 12-5a are preferred
        by mappers  [Tearpock and Bischke,  1991 ] unless the undulating contour lines
        in Figure  12-5b are supported by additional data.  Seismic correlations can be
        used to justify the more heterogeneous contouring style shown in Figure 12-5b.
        A growing body of literature provides additional discussion of this application
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130