Page 258 -
P. 258

240                                       8  Mining Additional Perspectives


              To understand the importance of short-term simulation, we elaborate on the
              difference between transient analysis and steady-state analysis. The key idea
              of simulation is to execute a model repeatedly. The reason for doing the ex-
              periments repeatedly, is to not come up with just a single value (e.g., “the
              average response time is 10.36 minutes”) but to provide confidence intervals
              (e.g., “the average response time is with 90 percent certainty between 10 and
              11 minutes”). For transient analysis, the focus is on the initial part of future
              behavior, i.e., starting from the initial state the “near future” is explored. For
              transient analysis, the initial state is very important. If the simulation starts in
              a state with long queues of work, then in the near future flow times will be
              long and it may take some time to get rid of the backlog. For steady-state anal-
              ysis, the initial state is irrelevant. Typically, the simulation is started “empty”
              (i.e., without any cases in progress) and only when the system is filled with
              cases the measurements start.
              Steady-state analysis is most relevant for answering strategic and tactical
              questions. Transient analysis is most relevant for operational decision making.
              Lion’s share of contemporary simulation support aims at steady-state analy-
              sis and, hence, is limited to strategic and tactical decision making. Short-term
              simulation focuses on operational decision making; starting from the current
              state—loaded from the BPM system—the “near future” is explored repeat-
              edly [95]. This shows what will happen if no corrective actions are taken.
              Moreover, “what if” analysis can be used to explore the effects of different
              actions (e.g., adding resources and reconfiguring the process).
              In [84], it is shown how this approach can be realized using the BPM system
              YAWL, the process mining tool ProM, and the simulation tool CPN Tools.This
              illustrates the potentially spectacular synergetic effects that can be achieved
              by combining workflow automation, process mining, and simulation.
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263