Page 146 - Rapid Learning in Robotics
P. 146

132                                  “Mixture-of-Expertise” or “Investment Learning”


                             The solution  ii   represents the coordinate transformation as the prod-
                          uct of the four successive transformations. Thus, in this case the Meta-
                          PSOM controls the coefficients of a matrix multiplication. As in  i , the
                          required parameter values   are gained by a suitable calibration, or sys-
                          tem identification procedure.
                             When no explicit ansatz for the T-BOX is readily available, we can use
                          method  iii  . Here, for each prototypical context, the required T-mapping
                          is learned by a network and becomes encoded in its weight set  . For this,
                          one can use any trainable network that meets the requirement stated at
                          the end of the previous section. However, PSOMs are a particularly con-
                          venient choice, since they can be directly constructed from a small data set
                          and additionally offer the advantage of associative multi-way mappings.
                             In this example, we chose for the T-BOX a2 2 2 “T-PSOM” that im-
                          plements the coordinate transform for both directions simultaneously. Its
                          training required eight training vectors arranged at the corners of a cubi-
                          cal grid, e.g. similar to the cube structure depicted in Fig. 7.2.
                             In order to compare approaches  i     iii  , the transformation T-BOX
                          accuracy was averaged over a set of 50 contexts (given by 50 randomly
                          chosen object poses), each with 100 object volume points  x   to be trans-
                          formed into camera coordinates  x  .


                                   T-BOX             x - RMS [L]    y - RMS [L]   z - RMS [L]


                                    (i) (    z   )      0.025          0.023          0.14
                                    (ii) {A ij }        0.016          0.015          0.14
                                    (iii) PSOM          0.015          0.014          0.12

                                      Table 9.1: Results for the three variants in Fig. 9.5.




                             Comparing the RMS results in Tab. 9.1 shows, that the PSOM approach
                          (iii) can fully compete with the dedicated hand-crafted, one-way mapping
                          solutions (i) and (ii).


                          9.3.2 Rapid Visuo-motor Coordination Learning

                          The next example is concerned with a robot sensorimotor transformation.
                          It involves the Puma robot manipulator, which is monitored by a camera,
                          see Fig. 9.6. The robot is positioned behind a table and the entire scene is
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151