Page 278 - Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts
P. 278

246                     Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts


         the pretreated biomass. Several research activities are going on for the development
         of a cost-effective strategy for bioethanol production.
           Takano and Hoshino (2018) reported bioethanol production from alkali-
         pretreated rice straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) using
         cellulase cocktail and a xylose fermenting fungus, Mucor circinelloides. The results
         indicate that under optimized conditions, 30.5 g/L of bioethanol was produced with
         a fermentation efficiency of 90%. Bioethanol production from sugarcane tops and
         leaves was reported by Mamphweli and Okoh (2017). Different pretreatment strate-
         gies, such as acid hydrolysis and alkaline peroxide pretreatment, were evaluated for
         bioethanol production. The study revealed that alkaline peroxide pretreatment gave
         better ethanol yield when compared to acid hydrolysis. The decrease in enzyme
         yield for acid hydrolyzed samples is due to the inhibition of fermentative microbes
         by the inhibitors generated during pretreatment. Momayez et al. (2017) used efflu-
         ent from biogas plant for the pretreatment of rice straw for bioethanol production.
         Biogas effluent contained different organic acids, such as acetic, butyric, lactic, and
         propionic. The results indicate that among the different organic acids present in the

         effluent, pretreatment with lactic acid was most effective. Pretreatment at 140 C
         resulted in an increase of glucose and ethanol concentration by 42.4% and 47.5%,
         respectively.
           Enhanced bioethanol production from hemicelluloses of wheat straw by mutant
         strain of pentose fermenting microorganisms—Pichia stipitis and Candida shehatae—
         was evaluated by Koti et al. (2016). Mutagenesis was carried out by physical
         and chemical mutagens. The study revealed that the mutated strains were capa-
         ble of producing significantly higher ethanol yields (12.15 g/L) when com-
         pared to wild strain (8.28 g/L). Wang et al. (2016) compared the effect of
         different pretreatment strategies on ethanol production from cotton stalks.
         Three different pretreatment strategies, such as dilute sulfuric acid pretreat-
         ment, ultrasound-assisted alkali pretreatment, and high pressure assisted
         alkali pretreatment, were evaluated for bioethanol production from cotton
         stalk. The study revealed that high pressure assisted alkali pretreatment gave
         the highest reducing sugar and ethanol yield with a better lignin removal from
         the pretreated biomass (271.7 mg/g and 45.53%, respectively). Baig and
         Dharmadhikari (2016) reported bioethanol production by immobilized cocul-
         ture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 36 and Pachysolon tannophilus
         MTCC 1077 using cotton stalk hydrolyzate. Under optimized conditions the
         coculture produced 3.94 g/L of bioethanol with a fermentation efficiency of
         69.53%. The immobilized cocultures showed the same ethanol yield and fer-
         mentation efficiency for three cycles.


         11.2.1.2 Biobutanol
         Butanol is a primary alcohol produced by acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) fermen-
         tation. Butanol is compatible with current automobile engines. It has high energy as
         well as low water solubility content that makes it a suitable candidate for the
         replacement of gasoline (Kumar and Gayen, 2011).
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283